Go back
Freedom of speak what you what

Freedom of speak what you what

Debates

R
The Guvnor....!!!!

The Dark Side

Joined
11 Sep 04
Moves
70118
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6238672.stm

I have always thought that Freedom of speech is an illusion, why should a student lose his rights when entering a school

DS
I'm A Mighty Pirate™

PaTROLLING the forum

Joined
01 Dec 04
Moves
36332
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RSMA1234
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6238672.stm

I have always thought that Freedom of speech is an illusion, why should a student lose his rights when entering a school
Because he narcissisticly abuses the right to try and pull of a controversial and offensive publicity stunt to get himself on TV.

R
The Guvnor....!!!!

The Dark Side

Joined
11 Sep 04
Moves
70118
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
Because he narcissisticly abuses the right to try and pull of a controversial and offensive publicity stunt to get himself on TV.
So what....does he still not have the freedom of speech ?

This is excally what I mean by an illusion, its ok to say something if the "powers that be" agree with it, but when they don't then its a different case

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RSMA1234
So what....does he still not have the freedom of speech ?

This is excally what I mean by an illusion, its ok to say something if the "powers that be" agree with it, but when they don't then its a different case
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.

He had something, so he weren't free.

R
The Guvnor....!!!!

The Dark Side

Joined
11 Sep 04
Moves
70118
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.

He had something, so he weren't free.
sorry a bit confused, (post-lunch brain downtime)

M
Steamin transies

Joined
22 Nov 06
Moves
3265
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.

He had something, so he weren't free.
What the hell is someone from South Africa doing quoting Janis Joplin?

You're an enigma, Bosse. An enigma I tells ya.

Bosse de Nage
Zellulärer Automat

Spiel des Lebens

Joined
27 Jan 05
Moves
90892
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
What the hell is someone from South Africa doing quoting Janis Joplin?
She's part of international popular culture...Kris Kristofferson wrote the song, though.

p

Joined
09 Dec 06
Moves
1553
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RSMA1234
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6238672.stm

I have always thought that Freedom of speech is an illusion, why should a student lose his rights when entering a school
Incredible, you think that an 18 year old should be allowed to encourage drug culture?

There is a huge problem in schools and much of it is that some students are often barrack room lawyers.

A few years ago there was a peace march in London.

All the yobs who were the most lazy, selfish and self absorbed pupils in the school, "threatened" to go on strike unless they were granted permission to go on the march.

M
Steamin transies

Joined
22 Nov 06
Moves
3265
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
She's part of international popular culture...Kris Kristofferson wrote the song, though.
Sweet Mary Mother of Jesus! You even know who Kris Kristofferson is! And how to spell it!

p

tinyurl.com/ywohm

Joined
01 May 07
Moves
27860
Clock
26 Jun 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RSMA1234
So what....does he still not have the freedom of speech ?

This is excally what I mean by an illusion, its ok to say something if the "powers that be" agree with it, but when they don't then its a different case
There are no absolute freedoms. Had he wanted to hold that banner at his house or on a random street corner, that would be within his freedom of speech. As he was at a school-sponsored event, school rules apply. He was advocating a currently-illegal activity because he wanted to get on television. It worked. It is indeed a murky area and slippery slope. Had he advocated helping slaves escape to freedom or ending apartheid or returning native lands to indigenous people, I suspect more people would have supported his position although some would consider the "big picture" to be the same. Additionally, he was not espousing a cause he believes in and taking a stand to correct injustice. He simply figured out what would get him the attention he craved and went for it. For some of us, that makes it harder to go to bat on his defense.

edit: On the plus side, it was nice to read a news story that had nothing to do with a single singer/actor/performer.

R
The Guvnor....!!!!

The Dark Side

Joined
11 Sep 04
Moves
70118
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by pawnhandler
There are no absolute freedoms. Had he wanted to hold that banner at his house or on a random street corner, that would be within his freedom of speech. As he was at a school-sponsored event, school rules apply. He was advocating a currently-illegal activity because he wanted to get on television. It worked. It is indeed a murky area and slippery sl ...[text shortened]... he craved and went for it. For some of us, that makes it harder to go to bat on his defense.
Fair enough, but freedom of speech is an illusion

I thought that the law of the land always takes precedent over school rules ?

I know bascially he is being a "nob", but all I'm trying to point out to all the users that "bark" on about freedom of speech is that it does not exist or if it does its within limits

M
Steamin transies

Joined
22 Nov 06
Moves
3265
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RSMA1234
Fair enough, but freedom of speech is an illusion

I thought that the law of the land always takes precedent over school rules ?

I know bascially he is being a "nob", but all I'm trying to point out to all the users that "bark" on about freedom of speech is that it does not exist or if it does its within limits
Of course it is within limits. All freedoms are.

R
The Guvnor....!!!!

The Dark Side

Joined
11 Sep 04
Moves
70118
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
Of course it is within limits. All freedoms are.
If a freedom is in a limit, then can it truly be classed as fredom ?

M
Steamin transies

Joined
22 Nov 06
Moves
3265
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RSMA1234
If a freedom is in a limit, then can it truly be classed as fredom ?
Certainly. My liberty ends where yours begins. If I could infringe on yours, it wouldn't be freedom at all.

R
The Guvnor....!!!!

The Dark Side

Joined
11 Sep 04
Moves
70118
Clock
26 Jun 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
Certainly. My liberty ends where yours begins. If I could infringe on yours, it wouldn't be freedom at all.
Agreed and glad to see are that way, its a shame that a lot of people are not

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.