@Metal-Brain saidI mean, gabbard definitely lied when she said she had evidence of a treasonous conspiracy, and then just declassified all the evidence that has been reviewed multiple times by multiple investigations, with no indication of a conspiracy of any kind.
That is what everybody says that has no evidence.
You have faith, not evidence.
Why aren't you willing to admit that?
@wildgrass saidNo, that is an opinion.
I mean, gabbard definitely lied when she said she had evidence of a treasonous conspiracy, and then just declassified all the evidence that has been reviewed multiple times by multiple investigations, with no indication of a conspiracy of any kind.
Why aren't you willing to admit that?
@wildgrass saidNo, where is your evidence?
Lol. Where's the evidence then?
It is your burden of proof here.
@Metal-Brain saidGabbard made the claim not me, duh.
No, where is your evidence?
It is your burden of proof here.
Gabard said Obama committed treason, she then provided old evidence that did not say what she said, and therefore she lied.
@wildgrass saidNo, it was not Gabbard. It was House intelligence. Gabbard was just reading the report.
Gabbard made the claim not me, duh.
Gabard said Obama committed treason, she then provided old evidence that did not say what she said, and therefore she lied.
@Metal-Brain saidWhat did they base the claim on?
No, it was not Gabbard. It was House intelligence. Gabbard was just reading the report.
@wildgrass saidIt was newly unclassified info. Stop lying.
Gabbard made the claim not me, duh.
Gabard said Obama committed treason, she then provided old evidence that did not say what she said, and therefore she lied.
@Metal-Brain saidJust because it was newly unclassified does not mean it says treason. Whats there that says treason?
It was newly unclassified info. Stop lying.
Also Durham reviewed the docs already, he explicitly said there was no information he asked for and did not receive. What is in the release that would change the overall assessment of what happened?
Seems like nothing.
@wildgrass saidTreason is the only thing Gabbard alleged. Everything else was her reading a report from house intelligence. Brennan admitted he had no evidence when he started the investigation. It was all based on the debunked Steele dossier.
Just because it was newly unclassified does not mean it says treason. Whats there that says treason?
Also Durham reviewed the docs already, he explicitly said there was no information he asked for and did not receive. What is in the release that would change the overall assessment of what happened?
Seems like nothing.
https://rumble.com/v6x0rno-bombshell-smoking-gun-proving-hillary-pushed-fake-russiagate-hoax.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a
You should focus on the Epstein coverup. This is a distraction from that.