@AverageJoe1 saidAccept for the minor pesky detail that Russia TRIED to manipulate votes but did not succeed so they DID try to flip the election to Trump and it didn't work, no votes were flipped by Russia but the CERTAINLY tried.
You little fellers won't soon forget what is on the horizon. Gabbard has it in government docs which have just been claissified. She appears real good at solving puzzles.
Yeah, Obama will not 'do time', that is not the point. The jury when this all comes out is not going to be 12 jurors....it will be 340M people. If only just for them to learn what they have bee ...[text shortened]... t so you know, if you want to join us Repubs, we will demand IDs. And you cannot be here illegally.
Gabbard has access to EXACTLY the same data as they had 5 years ago so there will be nothing new in there, much as you ALL want to get a democrat ANY democrat in trouble so you can say, see, even DEMS have traitors in their midst making it look ok that Trump is in fact a traitor himself being the head snake of the insurrection and BTW it WAS an insurrection, they WOULD have hung Pence if they could have found him and they DID injure 150 campus cops and several DID die.
Anyone who says otherwise is a Russian propogandist. Or worse.
Like Tulsi Gabbard. You probably didn't hear the report of Russian TV, they said Tulsi is Russia's GIRLFRIEND and a Russian ASSET.
So anything that makes the US look bad, Gabbard will run with it.
AND BTW this POS so called investigation will go ZERO nowhere because there IS no there there.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThough whenever you post anything I always look up your links, when you provide them, and Google the topic for good measure.
"Google it."
what you say when asked a question when debating a subject you know nothing about, just repeating lying lib talking points
It has shown that most of the time you incorrectly use the evidence you provide and more often than not your evidence contradicts the argument you make.
@sonhouse saidNo, it is not exactly the same stuff that they had years ago. You video game GENX people need to start following the news. Your wishful thinking is boring
Accept for the minor pesky detail that Russia TRIED to manipulate votes but did not succeed so they DID try to flip the election to Trump and it didn't work, no votes were flipped by Russia but the CERTAINLY tried.
Gabbard has access to EXACTLY the same data as they had 5 years ago so there will be nothing new in there, much as you ALL want to get a democrat ANY democrat ...[text shortened]... it.
AND BTW this POS so called investigation will go ZERO nowhere because there IS no there there.
@AverageJoe1 saidAnd your blind loyalty to Trump is plain disgusting. You don't care ICE gets a budget bigger than our entire Marine Corps, probably dancing in the street at the idea of ICE men going to every village in the US arresting anyone brown skin, citizen or not.
No, it is not exactly the same stuff that they had years ago. You video game GENX people need to start following the news. Your wishful thinking is boring
BTW, what about the stuff your Lord Trump said about ICE? only getting the worse of the worse? Putting a father of three marines in jail AFTER beating on the ground, yep real worse offender that one.
1 edit
@sonhouse saidI wrote to Sonhouse that Gabbard has intel that John Durham did not . (maybe she does , maybe she does not, but follow me for the issue of this thread. PLEASE).....
And your blind loyalty to Trump is plain disgusting. You don't care ICE gets a budget bigger than our entire Marine Corps, probably dancing in the street at the idea of ICE men going to every village in the US arresting anyone brown skin, citizen or not.
BTW, what about the stuff your Lord Trump said about ICE? only getting the worse of the worse? Putting a father of three marines in jail AFTER beating on the ground, yep real worse offender that one.
Sonhouse wrote back the above post. whatinthehell.
EVERYONE... PLEASE stay on an issue. I might have Biden Syndrome, and we all know Sonhouse has TDS.....but, jesus, no one wants to hear it. We are here to learn from each other, like my trying to learn the positive sides of socialism, such as that.
Can you all speak to each other at your next protest, and just agree to stay on subject?
@kmax87 saidYou got a tatoo do you Kmax. Only you know. If you do, you will not admit it. We see why, don't you see. Why do you see,,,,you agree with me, don't you? Iwould not either. If I had one on my arm, i would have my arm removed. I would have to, if I want a law firm to hire me. Sad.
You got to remember most MAGANON's live on Fantasy Island. Whenever they make a claim, I see Tattoo at the start of a new episode announce, De Plane, De Plane....
@wildgrass saidTrump picked a democrat to look into it? LOL!
Just because you haven't heard it doesn't make it fake.
This is why I wrote suggesting that you read the Durham report. He was handpicked by Trump to dig into this. He has full access to info. He spent three years investigating. That report has answers to all your questions, and will make it clear that tulsi is spouting complete BS.
You are full of it. Why would he do that?
@Metal-Brain saidAsk trump.
Trump picked a democrat to look into it? LOL!
You are full of it. Why would he do that?
@sonhouse saidYou are such a liar. Russia never tried to manipulate votes. You are just outright lying.
Accept for the minor pesky detail that Russia TRIED to manipulate votes but did not succeed so they DID try to flip the election to Trump and it didn't work, no votes were flipped by Russia but the CERTAINLY tried.
Gabbard has access to EXACTLY the same data as they had 5 years ago so there will be nothing new in there, much as you ALL want to get a democrat ANY democrat ...[text shortened]... it.
AND BTW this POS so called investigation will go ZERO nowhere because there IS no there there.
Did the U.S. Department of Homeland Security hacked our election in 3 states? That was the IP address the hack came from.
https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/more-states-confirm-cyber-attacks-sourced-to-dhs/476227320/
@AverageJoe1 saidAnnnnnnndd, we just can't make this stuff up.
You got a tatoo do you Kmax. Only you know. If you do, you will not admit it. We see why, don't you see. Why do you see,,,,you agree with me, don't you? Iwould not either. If I had one on my arm, i would have my arm removed. I would have to, if I want a law firm to hire me. Sad.
@Metal-Brain saidAnd this is a special kind of stupid.
I don't always pay attention to partisan bickering over a corrupt politician. A democrat did not find what democrats hate acknowledging exists in the first place. Hardly worth much of my time.
There is no evidence of Russian collusion to interfere that specific election.
There is evidence the CIA interfered in Russia's election though.
https://www.wsws.org/en/art ...[text shortened]... orld? You are like a fox advocating for poultry rights and demonizing a wolf for killing a chicken.
@wildgrass saidShe is not making up anything. It is all true, but it is the same stuff I have been telling you for years. It wasn't Russia. It was Seth Rich.
Ye she's making stuff up to flood the zone in the wake of Epstein findings and other bad news.
John Durham spent $9 million tax dollars on a partisan witch hunt to locate any shred of evidence that Obama had anything to do with it - and came up empty.
Did Trump's people forget that already?
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/julian-assange-russia-john-podesta-wikileaks-230676
Regardless of who leaked or hacked the DNC emails they revealed election meddling in the DNC. That was a great service to our nation. Why do you want to credit Russia for revealing the primary election was rigged against Sanders? That would make Russia our heroes. Election heroes.
@Suzianne saidYou are trying to rewrite history. Gabbard simply read intelligence reports from government agencies. She didn't write them. So your problem is not with Gabbard, it is with our intelligence agencies.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trumps-intelligence-chiefs-try-rewrite-history-2016-election-rcna220103
Trump's intelligence chiefs try to rewrite the history of the 2016 election
[i]Five years ago, Marco Rubio said there was "irrefutable evidence of Russian meddling.” Now, Tulsi Gabbard says that claim is “treasonous" and should be criminally i ...[text shortened]... lection towards Trump,” Miller told the investigative newsletter SpyTalk. “And that’s a crime?” [/b]
It is the FBI and DNI that you think are trying to rewrite history. And that is who wildgrass was really saying made it up. Like you he thought it was Gabbard.