Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    14739
    16 Mar '16 14:29
    I'm saying it again. He was unfairly demonized and did not deserve it.

    What is the worst thing Gaddafi has done? If you think the propaganda demonizing him is true make your case, but be fair about it. Allegations and proof are 2 different things.
  2. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    16 Mar '16 14:371 edit
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    I'm saying it again. He was unfairly demonized and did not deserve it.

    What is the worst thing Gaddafi has done? If you think the propaganda demonizing him is true make your case, but be fair about it. Allegations and proof are 2 different things.
    Those in Libya had the highest standard of living in North Africa.
  3. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    16 Mar '16 14:56
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    I'm saying it again. He was unfairly demonized and did not deserve it.

    What is the worst thing Gaddafi has done? If you think the propaganda demonizing him is true make your case, but be fair about it. Allegations and proof are 2 different things.
    Let me guess. He had nothing to do with Pan Am Flight 103.

    Am I right?
  4. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    16 Mar '16 15:34
    Originally posted by Metal Brain

    What is the worst thing Gaddafi has done?
    Killing a bunch of people.
  5. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    16 Mar '16 16:04
    Originally posted by sh76
    Let me guess. He had nothing to do with Pan Am Flight 103.

    Am I right?
    So all world leaders that kill other people need to be removed?

    Sounds like you are an anarchist to me.
  6. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    16 Mar '16 16:061 edit
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    Killing a bunch of people.
    Too bad Gaddfi did not have a fleet of drones and the PC speech to smile pretty like Obama.

    If he had, Gaddafi may have won a Nobel Peace Prize.

    Speaking of which, Obama said the US mission was to keep a no fly zone and they were not there to remove Gaddafi.

    Sending hundreds of bombs over Libya is an odd way to enforce a no fly zone, but what do I know
  7. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    16 Mar '16 16:21
    Originally posted by whodey
    So all world leaders that kill other people need to be removed?

    Sounds like you are an anarchist to me.
    I'd say that removing leaders who order the bombing of a civilian airliner would be a good idea.
  8. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    16 Mar '16 16:26
    Originally posted by sh76
    I'd say that removing leaders who order the bombing of a civilian airliner would be a good idea.
    You mean like Putin?
  9. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    16 Mar '16 17:12
    Originally posted by whodey
    what do I know
    Good question.
  10. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39965
    16 Mar '16 18:12
    Originally posted by sh76
    I'd say that removing leaders who order the bombing of a civilian airliner would be a good idea.
    There's little credible evidence that Gaddafi "ordered" the bombing of Flight 103. And it is fairly preposterous to claim that the intervention in 2011 had any link to a crime committed in 1988.
  11. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    16 Mar '16 18:262 edits
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    There's little credible evidence that Gaddafi "ordered" the bombing of Flight 103. And it is fairly preposterous to claim that the intervention in 2011 had any link to a crime committed in 1988.
    Statement of the justice minister of Libya not enough evidence for you?

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-12552587

    Anyway, while Gaddafi certainly did more bad things than just the Lockerbie bombing, that alone would have been sufficient cause to take him out, IMO.

    The decision to help take him out was also based on the opportunity that presented itself, of course. The administration's decision to support the rebels was based partially on Gaddafi's history, of which Lockerbie was a part.
  12. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39965
    16 Mar '16 18:334 edits
    Originally posted by sh76
    Statement of the justice minister of Libya not enough evidence for you?

    http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-12552587

    Anyway, while Gaddafi certainly did more bad things than just the Lockerbie bombing, that alone would have been sufficient cause to take him out, IMO.

    The decision to help take him out was also based on the opportunity tha ...[text shortened]... n to support the rebels was based partially on Gaddafi's history, of which Lockerbie was a part.
    No, it isn't since he later repudiated that statement and offered no evidence to support it. It was also made when Abdel-Jalil was an active leader in the revolution and calling for international intervention to support it making such a statement self-serving grist for the gullible like yourself.

    The idea that the US can simply decide which leaders of foreign countries it can overthrow when "opportunity presents itself" is a shocking one and contrary to any reasonable interpretation of international law.

    EDIT: However, he insisted he had been misquoted by a Swedish newspaper last year which claimed he had evidence that Gaddafi personally ordered the December 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, which claimed 270 lives.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/332936/Lockerbie-The-truth-at-last

    EDIT2: Since the Gaddafi boogie man has been disposed of, it is now fashionable to blame Iran for the Lockerbie bombing. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/10688067/Lockerbie-bombing-was-work-of-Iran-not-Libya-says-former-spy.html

    So you should get with the program; of course, if we can oust the ayatollahs there are plenty of other countries that we can unearth new evidence against to "prove" they ordered the Lockerbie bombing.
  13. wherever I am needed
    Joined
    13 Dec '12
    Moves
    40201
    16 Mar '16 23:19
    well, he was responsible for ordering the murder of PC Yvonne Fletcher in the mid 80s in the UK.

    May be 'small beer' on an international stage, but certainly narked us in UK at the time (especially Ms Fletcher's family)
  14. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52853
    17 Mar '16 01:02
    Originally posted by st dominics preview
    well, he was responsible for ordering the murder of PC Yvonne Fletcher in the mid 80s in the UK.

    May be 'small beer' on an international stage, but certainly narked us in UK at the time (especially Ms Fletcher's family)
    Look at him in the light of dudes like Pol Pot or Idi Amin. I think they were a lot more bloodthirsty than Gadaf.
  15. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39965
    17 Mar '16 04:05
    Originally posted by st dominics preview
    well, he was responsible for ordering the murder of PC Yvonne Fletcher in the mid 80s in the UK.

    May be 'small beer' on an international stage, but certainly narked us in UK at the time (especially Ms Fletcher's family)
    This is another highly dubious claim without any credible evidence to support it. Fletcher was shot outside the Libyan Embassy in London during an anti-Gaddafi demonstration; that Gaddafi ordered this is speculation at best.
Back to Top