Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Standard member Seitse
    Doug Stanhope
    13 Jun '11 06:21
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-13744980

    A Girl Gay in Damascus gained a worldwide readership
    and was closely followed by news organisations.

    But the true author has now come forward - Tom MacMaster,
    an American man studying in Scotland.


    * * *

    Oh, this is just another example of how Western media (and
    its brainwashed following) treat the Middle East: they are
    profoundly ignorant about the complexities of the region and
    just grab whatever is fed to them, particularly what is according
    to their bias, causing a chaos in the heads of those who just
    munch whatever information they are given.

    Just like Pallywood. This reminds me of the Palestinians
    parading a coffin of a man "murdered" by the IDF... and who
    "resurrects" after the cameras are gone, lol.

    Clowns.
  2. Subscriber FMF
    a.k.a. John W Booth
    13 Jun '11 06:28 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by Seitse
    they are
    profoundly ignorant about the complexities of the region and
    just grab whatever is fed to them, particularly what is according
    to their bias, causing a chaos in the heads of those who just
    munch whatever information they are given.
    Being ignorant about the complexities of the region? Just grabbing whatever is fed to them, particularly what is according to their bias? You may well have a valid point but you could just as easily be talking about posters like yourself.

    There really is nothing about your tabloid style partisan blurtings, followed-up as they invariably are with puerile insults, that suggest you are anything other than just another brainwashed follower of what you happen to choose to follow, who munches whatever information [you] are given, as you put it in your OP.
  3. Standard member Seitse
    Doug Stanhope
    13 Jun '11 07:30
    Originally posted by FMF
    Being ignorant about the complexities of the region? Just grabbing whatever is fed to them, particularly what is according to their bias? You may well have a valid point but you could just as easily be talking about posters like yourself.

    There really is nothing about your tabloid style partisan blurtings, followed-up as they invariably are with puerile insul ...[text shortened]... to choose to follow, who munches whatever information [you] are given, as you put it in your OP.
    The difference, Gary, is that this is a random forum in a chess
    website, not the freakin' BBC, you ignorant idiot.

    Chew that a bit.
  4. Subscriber FMF
    a.k.a. John W Booth
    13 Jun '11 07:38
    Originally posted by Seitse
    The difference, Gary, is that this is a random forum in a chess
    website, not the freakin' BBC, you ignorant idiot.

    Chew that a bit.
    See. My point proved.
  5. Standard member Seitse
    Doug Stanhope
    13 Jun '11 07:54
    Originally posted by FMF
    See. My point proved.
    Not, it is not. It proves that you get your "knowledge" from
    opinions shared by random strangers in a chess website, instead
    of using reliable sources. It speaks a ton about you, actually.

    It is quite pathetic, I must say, that you take seriously a place
    which is intended just for laughs.
  6. Subscriber FMF
    a.k.a. John W Booth
    13 Jun '11 07:56 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by Seitse
    Not, it is not. It proves that you get your "knowledge" from
    opinions shared by random strangers in a chess website, instead
    of using reliable sources. It speaks a ton about you, actually.

    It is quite pathetic, I must say, that you take seriously a place
    which is intended just for laughs.
    You're just trying to be funny. But you're not funny.

    Silly tabloid taunting. Followed up by attempted unfunny insults. I called it. Q.E.D.
  7. Standard member Seitse
    Doug Stanhope
    13 Jun '11 08:12
    Originally posted by FMF
    You're just trying to be funny. But you're not funny.

    Silly tabloid taunting. Followed up by attempted unfunny insults. I called it. Q.E.D.
    Yet another tedious and predictable "comeback" from you.
  8. 13 Jun '11 09:34
    Oh you two!