Go back
George bush or a peanut, who would you rather a...

George bush or a peanut, who would you rather a...

Debates

k

Joined
25 Jun 07
Moves
1820
Clock
31 Jul 07
3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

I personally would prefer the peanut, because it couldn't do more harm than good

firstly.GWB attacked iraq for no reason, just because he said its a a war on terror and he knew that Iran had the weapons so iran would actually fight back, i mean seriously!(9/11 may have killed 5000 people, maybe more, and so far the war in Iraq has killed over 75000 innocent lives, with hundreds of thousands more being held captive with little or no evidence, and thats only since he declared the war on terror had been won, golly gosh wow, we really do owe the US a debt,(and we can't pull out because we pretty much depend on them as allies for so much stuff, but ever since GWB came into office the american dollars been dropping, so it wont be for long then we can leave the stupid war, i mean george bush almost died chocking in a freakin pretzel, so why would oyu prefer him over the peanut huh?

w
Chocolate Expert

Cocoa Mountains

Joined
26 Nov 06
Moves
19249
Clock
31 Jul 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by knightistwoqueens
I personally would prefer the peanut, because it couldn't do more harm than good

firstly.GWB attacked iraq for no reason, just because he said its a a war on terror and he knew that Iran had the weapons so iran would actually fight back, i mean seriously!(9/11 may have killed 5000 people, maybe more, and so far the war in Iraq has killed over 75 ...[text shortened]... sh almost died chocking in a freakin pretzel, so why would oyu prefer him over the peanut huh?
Correct conclusion, not the best (presentation of) evidence.

k

Joined
25 Jun 07
Moves
1820
Clock
31 Jul 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

i suppooise your probably right but im not that good at it

l

Joined
18 Aug 06
Moves
43663
Clock
31 Jul 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by knightistwoqueens
I personally would prefer the peanut, because it couldn't do more harm than good

firstly.GWB attacked iraq for no reason, just because he said its a a war on terror and he knew that Iran had the weapons so iran would actually fight back, i mean seriously!(9/11 may have killed 5000 people, maybe more, and so far the war in Iraq has killed over 75 ...[text shortened]... sh almost died chocking in a freakin pretzel, so why would oyu prefer him over the peanut huh?
I think it will be good when people stop relying on the US. We can take care of our own stuff and you can take care of yours.

w
Chocolate Expert

Cocoa Mountains

Joined
26 Nov 06
Moves
19249
Clock
31 Jul 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by knightistwoqueens
i suppooise your probably right but im not that good at it
No problem. It was just a wordy explanation, that's all.

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
31 Jul 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by knightistwoqueens
GWB attacked iraq for no reason,....
Do you seriously think that GWB had no reason? Or is it that you dont know the reason? Or do you mean that the reason he gave was not valid? I personally dont believe that many of the americans who supported his action believed that that (WMDs) was the reason for the war but still supported it for other reasons.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.