Originally posted by savage4731 Your willingness to talk about the one success of Obama in the midst of probably the worst thing he's done kind of reminds of Baghdad Bob claiming the iraqi's are winning while in the background a tank is running over a Saddam statue.
Your willingness to politicize a harmless news article seems to be a quintessential personification of U.S. conservatives' mantra to "Make Obama a one-term president."
Just leave dignity and respect by the doorway on your way out.
Originally posted by wittywonka Your willingness to politicize a harmless news article seems to be a quintessential personification of U.S. conservatives' mantra to "Make Obama a one-term president."
Just leave dignity and respect by the doorway on your way out.
Me? Politicize?
I didn't start the thread. You might want to look there first. I only responded to what others had done and pointed it out.
Originally posted by wittywonka No, I'm not buying your "don't blame me" act.
Specifically, what words in the OP were politically charged or motivated?
ummm... the words "getting bin laden" maybe?
If you ask yourself who it was that got bin laden then you've got your answer.
When a known liberal extremist whack job starts a thread about Obama's best accomplishment right in the middle of his biggest failure its him politicizing it. The fact that Obama's only accomplishment may also have been a failure doesn't change anything. It just means he's a really lousy President.
Originally posted by savage4731 ummm... the words "getting bin laden" maybe?
If you ask yourself who it was that got bin laden then you've got your answer.
When a known liberal extremist whack job starts a thread about Obama's best accomplishment right in the middle of his biggest failure its him politicizing it. The fact that Obama's only accomplishment may also have been a failure doesn't change anything. It just means he's a really lousy President.
Your response is nothing more than a weak effort to avoid admitting that you overreacted to the OP. "Getting bin Laden" is politically charged rhetoric? Please.
If you weren't trying to politicize this post, you wouldn't be trying to delegitimize both Kunsoo and Obama in the first place. A "known liberal extremist whack job"? Really? No, you're not politicizing this at all. Let alone trying to diminish the importance of Osama bin Laden's death for Americans in the first place: "Obama's only accomplishment may also have been a failure." Really?
Heaven forbid that somebody should post one thread out of thirty in an anonymous internet chat forum on a correspondence chess website that deals with an issue not related to mainstream news coverage of the economy.
Originally posted by FMF Now we know what whodey would probably be like on amphetamine sulphate.
I'm not sure why I didn't put two and two together, but I just remembered that savage4731 is the same outspoken user who argued back in Thread 139858 that:
1) "almost all [poor people] have cars, TVs, cell phones, Xboxes and free access to the internet."
2) "[France] [has] become a socialist country and a burden on the rest of Europe."
3) "Minorities were making a lot of progress all the way up to the civil rights laws and have been in full reverse ever since..."
Admittedly it's a bit irrelevant, but it just shows you where on the ideological plane savage4731 is coming from...
Originally posted by savage4731 ummm... the words "getting bin laden" maybe?
If you ask yourself who it was that got bin laden then you've got your answer.
When a known liberal extremist whack job starts a thread about Obama's best accomplishment right in the middle of his biggest failure its him politicizing it. The fact that Obama's only accomplishment may also have been a failure doesn't change anything. It just means he's a really lousy President.
"Getting Bin Laden" happens to be the title of the article you obviously didn't bother to read. You're the one who tried to make a political issue of it. Nobody else.
Originally posted by wittywonka Your response is nothing more than a weak effort to avoid admitting that you overreacted to the OP. "Getting bin Laden" is politically charged rhetoric? Please.
If you weren't trying to politicize this post, you wouldn't be trying to delegitimize both Kunsoo and Obama in the first place. A "known liberal extremist whack job"? Really? No, you're no ...[text shortened]... site that deals with an issue not related to mainstream news coverage of the economy.
The article came out in this week's New Yorker. Not that it matters, but that's the basis for the timing.
Originally posted by savage4731 I don't care what the article says. Nobody's going to read it anyway. 99% of the people that see your thread will only see the title. I think you realize that. Yes, it may criticize Obama but hardly anybody is going to realize that and it gives the perfect fallback so you can say you're not doing exactly what it is you're doing.
You liberal propagandists are sneaky.
No wonder everyone hates the US right.
You're a babbling idiot.
What does the CIA call you guys again? Oh yeah, "the crazies".
And that coming from the CIA...
Getting Bin Laden
09 Aug '11 00:09
Back to Top