In the warped mind of a progressive, everything seems to be = these days unless it involves conservatives or the unborn.
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/01/107526-house-democrats-climate-change-turns-women-prostitutes/
The logic, if you can call it that, goes something like this. Global warming is destroying jobs. Women need jobs, so more women then become prostitutes.
Makes sense to me. The only question I have, is what does Bill Clinton think of this hypothesis? Is this an argument for or against global warming?
11 Jan 14
That website seems like a perfect place for you to have all your preconceived notions re-affirmed again and again and again, Whodey. Certainly, when reading the comments below the "article" it's like reading the opinions of a multitude of Whodey clones. You should get all your news from websites like that!
Any chance you can point us to the actual resolution this "article" speaks of instead of having us believe what the resolution says purely on the basis of this "article"?
Originally posted by Great King Rathttp://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th/house-concurrent-resolution/36/text
That website seems like a perfect place for you to have all your preconceived notions re-affirmed again and again and again, Whodey. Certainly, when reading the comments below the "article" it's like reading the opinions of a multitude of Whodey clones. You should get all your news from websites like that!
Any chance you can point us to the actual ...[text shortened]... of instead of having us believe what the resolution says purely on the basis of this "article"?
It is concurrent resolution 36, champion by representative Barbara Lee.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
11 Jan 14
Originally posted by whodeySo I expect that the situation will lead some men and some women into desperate, even criminal measures.
In the warped mind of a progressive, everything seems to be = these days unless it involves conservatives or the unborn.
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/01/107526-house-democrats-climate-change-turns-women-prostitutes/
The logic, if you can call it that, goes something like this. Global warming is destroying jobs. Women need jobs, so more women then beco ...[text shortened]... does Bill Clinton think of this hypothesis? Is this an argument for or against global warming?
The women have the more vocal lobby. That's all.
11 Jan 14
Originally posted by whodeyThis is a predictably hysterical response to this rather innocuous statement in the resolution:
In the warped mind of a progressive, everything seems to be = these days unless it involves conservatives or the unborn.
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/01/107526-house-democrats-climate-change-turns-women-prostitutes/
The logic, if you can call it that, goes something like this. Global warming is destroying jobs. Women need jobs, so more women then beco ...[text shortened]... does Bill Clinton think of this hypothesis? Is this an argument for or against global warming?
Whereas food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be
vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early
marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and
poor reproductive health;
Needless to say, it is a fabrication of what purports to be whodey's "mind" to recast this as: Global warming is destroying jobs. Women need jobs, so more women then become prostitutes.
12 Jan 14
Originally posted by no1marauderSay what you will, but it appears that the socioeconomic poo that we are being led into will be blamed on global warming.
This is a predictably hysterical response to this rather innocuous statement in the resolution:
Whereas food insecure women with limited socioeconomic resources may be
vulnerable to situations such as sex work, transactional sex, and early
marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and
poor reprodu ...[text shortened]... as: Global warming is destroying jobs. Women need jobs, so more women then become prostitutes.
It's too bad, I miss blaming "W" for everything.
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
12 Jan 14
1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyYou might be interested in the Bronze Age Collapse.
Say what you will, but it appears that the socioeconomic poo that we are being led into will be blamed on global warming.
It's too bad, I miss blaming "W" for everything.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Age_collapse
I don't think we've gained much more ability to correlate climate to collapse. But drought seemed to play a role.
16 Jan 14
1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyMonica Lewinsky was a psychology graduate, and in her 20s, at the time of her sexual relationship with Bill Clinton. If he'd wanted someone vulnerable and easy to take advantage of, she was far from the obvious choice. Other than that, what's your basis for accusing Bill Clinton (at least, by implication) of taking advantage of vulnerable women?
In the warped mind of a progressive, everything seems to be = these days unless it involves conservatives or the unborn.
http://www.ijreview.com/2014/01/107526-house-democrats-climate-change-turns-women-prostitutes/
The logic, if you can call it that, goes something like this. Global warming is destroying jobs. Women need jobs, so more women then beco ...[text shortened]... does Bill Clinton think of this hypothesis? Is this an argument for or against global warming?
18 Jan 14
Originally posted by karnachzThe President of the US targeting an intern?
Monica Lewinsky was a psychology graduate, and in her 20s, at the time of her sexual relationship with Bill Clinton. If he'd wanted someone vulnerable and easy to take advantage of, she was far from the obvious choice. Other than that, what's your basis for accusing Bill Clinton (at least, by implication) of taking advantage of vulnerable women?
Beats me. I'll leave it to you libs to justify all that.