Go back
Global Warming is a bunch of bull

Global Warming is a bunch of bull

Debates

A
Checkmate 2 U!

Checkmating you!

Joined
16 Dec 06
Moves
42778
Clock
31 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Throw some evidence at me... I'd be glad to try and kill it.

t
Gandalf's Hero.

And I should say????

Joined
17 Nov 06
Moves
23102
Clock
31 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

ok!!!
1.So you think their is nothing linking the ozon gap over our poles?
2.Has nothing to do with polution on the grand scale we are doing now?
3.So the fumes from our cars, trailers and inustry, are not toxic in any shape or form?
Good luck disproving me and thies are my medium hard ones I have harder questions for you.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89737
Clock
31 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Acemaster
Throw some evidence at me... I'd be glad to try and kill it.
George W. Bush wants the polar bear to be put on the "endangered species" list, because its environment is melting...

s

Joined
23 Sep 05
Moves
11774
Clock
31 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Acemaster
Throw some evidence at me... I'd be glad to try and kill it.
It's currently raining here in Stockholm. 😞

A
Checkmate 2 U!

Checkmating you!

Joined
16 Dec 06
Moves
42778
Clock
31 Dec 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by theprotectors

1.So you think their is nothing linking the ozon gap over our poles?
2.Has nothing to do with polution on the grand scale we are doing now?
3.So the fumes from our cars, trailers and inustry, are not toxic in any shape or form?
1. No.
2. It has been caculated that if we continue on the same level of pollution that we are on now, the icecaps will melt in about 200 years. Even though that sounds bad for everyone 200 years in the future, the icecaps melting will only raise the level of water by 36 feet.
3. I never said that the fumes aren't toxic. I said that they won't cause global warming. Refer to answer #2.

Bad wolf

Joined
23 Jul 05
Moves
8869
Clock
01 Jan 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Acemaster
1. No.
2. It has been caculated that if we continue on the same level of pollution that we are on now, the icecaps will melt in about 200 years. Even though that sounds bad for everyone 200 years in the future, the icecaps melting will only raise the level of water by 36 feet.
3. I never said that the fumes aren't toxic. I said that they won't cause global warming. Refer to answer #2.
1. Aerosols...
2. I've heard figures much larger...
+ goodby Bangladesh...

+ Oh and we won't just be continuing on the same levels of CO2 emission, it is growing, each year we are putting more CO2 out than in previous years...

3. CO2, methane...

T

Joined
26 Nov 06
Moves
4690
Clock
01 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

hmmm...

Global warming is hardly debateable.

The cause of global warming is where the real debate is.

Bad wolf

Joined
23 Jul 05
Moves
8869
Clock
01 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Teshuvah
hmmm...

Global warming is hardly debateable.

The cause of global warming is where the real debate is.
No, not really.

T

Joined
26 Nov 06
Moves
4690
Clock
01 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Oh let me play!

Yes. Yes, really.

l

Milton Keynes, UK

Joined
28 Jul 04
Moves
81588
Clock
01 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Acemaster
only raise the level of water by 36 feet.
You don't think this is significant?

A
Checkmate 2 U!

Checkmating you!

Joined
16 Dec 06
Moves
42778
Clock
01 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bad wolf
I've heard figures much larger...

+ Oh and we won't just be continuing on the same levels of CO2 emission, it is growing, each year we are putting more CO2 out than in previous years...

3. CO2, methane...[/b]
Where have you seen these figures?

CO2 levels may be rising, but we should look at this as a blessing. It won't hurt us as much as it will help us. Higher CO2 levels mean better plant life. As for methane, that doesn't hurt the enviroment. The New Zealand governmnent's economy was crashing, so they needed something more than just cars to tax. So they started taxing cow farts. (I'm not joking! They really did!)

A
Checkmate 2 U!

Checkmating you!

Joined
16 Dec 06
Moves
42778
Clock
01 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lausey
You don't think this is significant?
You didn't put in my whole quote. I said that the icecaps meltin will raise the water by 36 feet.

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
01 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Acemaster
Throw some evidence at me... I'd be glad to try and kill it.
1. Holes in the ozone layer.

2. AlGore made a movie about this.

3. I rest my case.

😕

e
leperchaun messiah

thru a glass onion

Joined
19 Apr 03
Moves
16870
Clock
01 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Acemaster
Where have you seen these figures?
Irrelevant. 🙄

Bad wolf

Joined
23 Jul 05
Moves
8869
Clock
01 Jan 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Acemaster
Where have you seen these figures?

CO2 levels may be rising, but we should look at this as a blessing. It won't hurt us as much as it will help us. Higher CO2 levels mean better plant life. As for methane, that doesn't hurt the enviroment. The New Zealand governmnent's economy was crashing, so they needed something more than just cars to tax. So they started taxing cow farts. (I'm not joking! They really did!)
Here is something I have written in the past on these forums

But it will warm less, that's what I'm getting at, the earth will warm less than what it would if we did nothing to reduce CO2 emissions.
You see because of the CO2 emissions we have already dumped in the atmosphere we have already committed oursleves to some warming, and the related affects.
But at the higher temperatures there will be comparably much more damage done than done by lower increases in temperature.

Consider the idea that moderate warming would damage crop yields in places like Africa, but increase them in places in Canada.
But increasingly higher temperatures will have increasingly damaging affects on Africa, as well as places further north like Canada.

You see crop yields depend on the temperatures.
Think of it like a hill: you walk up the hill, increasing in temperature, but also in crop yield - you reach the optimum temperature at the top.
You continue walking, down the hill, the temperature continues to increase, but crop yields are falling, you have gone beyond the optimum temperatures for your crops and so your crop yields suffer.
You can also think of it like a rainbow.

This is why the higher temperatures global warming would cause (if we do nothing) is such a bad thing.


Take from this what you can



There is a carbon fertilisation affect, where plants will gain from this. But with the damaging higher temperatures the overall gain from this will eventually be negative, especially at the higher temperatures.



Methane is 40 times more affective at trapping heat compared to CO2, 40 times more affective! Do you understand why this is then also a problem then?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.