1 edit
Originally posted by mrstabbyyou don't understand the ramifications of "climategate is less than a month old"?
Yes of course, YOU'VE been hearing that there's "no opposition", you listen to politicians rather than scientists for your anti-AGW soundbites. Scientists disagree over practically everything. [b]Consensus does not mean 100% agreement, it means general agreement
The majority of climate scientists agree that we're causing an overall warming effect. nt that says there is no consensus, or are you only ever going to quote political sources?[/b]
google this a year from now, see if it's different:
google: "overwhelming scientific consensus" warming
http://tinyurl.com/yz3bxje
Originally posted by zeeblebotDo it by google?... Fair enough, I can even wait till 2014 for the next IPCC meeting. Whether Mann et al take part or not the conclusions will be similar. Tell you what, we'll see if any reputable journals develop a stance against the AGW theory in the next year.
you don't understand the ramifications of "climategate is less than a month old"?
google this a year from now, see if it's different:
google: "overwhelming scientific consensus" warming
http://tinyurl.com/yz3bxje
Originally posted by mrstabbyLike George Monbiot, of The Guardian's Environmental Desk, paid for by Shell Oil?
Do it by google?... Fair enough, I can even wait till 2014 for the next IPCC meeting. Whether Mann et al take part or not the conclusions will be similar. Tell you what, we'll see if any reputable journals develop a stance against the AGW theory in the next year.