Go back
Good old golden showers!

Good old golden showers!

Debates


Hot diggity damn!

Oh? It might not be true?
Like Hillary being a killer?
Like pornshop pizza hut?
Like WMD in Iraq!

Wake up folks! Elvis left the building and (for reasons probably only the colonel knows) he took facts with him!

I like the idea of a cheap Moscow whore, paid by the Russian secret service, venerial pus dripping from her wretched, stinking labia, urinating in the American president's mouth.

Yes! I'd watch that video!

What's the sequal gonna be like? Hopefully it will have something to do with China, typhoid, scat and munching.


Originally posted by shavixmir
Hot diggity damn!

Oh? It might not be true?
Like Hillary being a killer?
Like pornshop pizza hut?
Like WMD in Iraq!

Wake up folks! Elvis left the building and (for reasons probably only the colonel knows) he took facts with him!

I like the idea of a cheap Moscow whore, paid by the Russian secret service, venerial pus dripping from her wretched, ...[text shortened]... al gonna be like? Hopefully it will have something to do with China, typhoid, scat and munching.
Unlike Pizzagate and Clinton, Inc.'s Trail of Death, this pathetic stab at relevance--- likely initiated by that failed soldier (from New Mexico? Arizona? where ever), John McCain, who tried his durndest to be the good lapdog that he is--- was wholly unsubstantiated.
The conclusions by those who have examined the circumstantial evidence in the two mentioned scenarios is based on examination first, not 'conclusion first, find something to support it.'

Only those who have not examined the circumstantial evidence claim 'there's nothing to see here' or 'debunked.'
Those who have objectively considered the facts?
Absolutely something is seriously amiss.

1 edit

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Unlike Pizzagate and Clinton, Inc.'s Trail of Death, this pathetic stab at relevance--- likely initiated by that failed soldier (from New Mexico? Arizona? where ever), John McCain, who tried his durndest to be the good lapdog that he is--- was wholly unsubstantiated.
The conclusions by those who have examined the circumstantial evidence in the two mention ...[text shortened]... ed.'
Those who have objectively considered the facts?
Absolutely something is seriously amiss.
Amazing!
I read your whole post and the only thing that stuck is that you and Trump drink pus-infused urine.


Another anti-Trump story that nobody gives a damn about.

1 edit

Originally posted by sh76
Another anti-Trump story that nobody gives a damn about.
If nobody "gives a damn about" it then why are there so many threads about it?


Originally posted by DeepThought
If nobody "gives a damn about" it then why are there so many threads about it?
Because, like you, the libtards are going absolutely bonkers trying to wriggle out of a country with an actual leader and an actual direction which is in line with the values of the majority of citizens.
Believe it or not, Meryl Streep doesn't speak for Main Street America.


Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Because, like you, the libtards are going absolutely bonkers trying to wriggle out of a country with an actual leader and an actual direction which is in line with the values of the majority of citizens.
Believe it or not, Meryl Streep doesn't speak for Main Street America.
I think more people voted for Hillery, there, dude.


Originally posted by shavixmir
I think more people voted for Hillery, there, dude.
Not for how our election process works.
Dude.


Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Not for how our election process works.
Dude.
Oh yes.
You see, your system doesn't take "majority of the US voters" into account.

What you can't say is that the majority wants Trump and his moronic ramblings.


Originally posted by shavixmir
Oh yes.
You see, your system doesn't take "majority of the US voters" into account.

What you can't say is that the majority wants Trump and his moronic ramblings.
Of the majority which voted for HRC, a significant portion (by conservative estimates, two to three million) were either unqualified by virtue of their status as illegal aliens, dead, or had already voted at least once.

That not withstanding, Trump revealed why he is and was the better candidate: he put his efforts where they would have the most impact.
Also, it can be said without equivocation that the majority is at complete and utter divergence from the likes of you; namely, stable people do not venerate the sick and utterly vile degeneracy--- real or imagined--- you celebrate.


Originally posted by DeepThought
If nobody "gives a damn about" it then why are there so many threads about it?
Because it has some perverse slapstick-like amusement value.

2 edits

Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Of the majority which voted for HRC, a significant portion (by conservative estimates, two to three million) were either unqualified by virtue of their status as illegal aliens, dead, or had already voted at least once.

That not withstanding, Trump revealed why he is and was the better candidate: he put his efforts where they would have the most impact. ...[text shortened]... eople do not venerate the sick and utterly vile degeneracy--- real or imagined--- you celebrate.
Of the majority of people who voted for Trump, the majority were high on drugs (should have been in jail), were having a psychotic episode (which means you can't vote) or didn't exist entirely (were fake votes cast by Putin).

More people (per head of the breathing population) voted for Hil Clinton.

No discussion possible.


Originally posted by DeepThought
If nobody "gives a damn about" it then why are there so many threads about it?
It's all Shav knows.


Originally posted by DeepThought
If nobody "gives a damn about" it then why are there so many threads about it?
This is how the Right took over the government. Non-stop accusations and unpleasant rumors about the Democrats.