Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleLMAO!
Sad that is not too far fetched to be true.
I thought this was 100% believable.
Too sad.
Originally posted by @js357No, it says a lot about the Left. They ignore laws and make up their own rules.
"I thought this was 100% believable. "
You are probably unaware of what you just admitted. It says a LOT about you, but it isn't anything that is not already known, except, apparently, by you.
I believe the term is, lawless.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleAnd a brief review of yours is enough to:
a brief review of you postings should suffice
- know that you are always wrong
- your use of English is reason enough to ignore absolutely everything you say.
- if one of the two isn't enough, just consider the other.
Originally posted by @shavixmirA sentence never begins with the word "and'.
And a brief review of yours is enough to:
- know that you are always wrong
- your use of English is reason enough to ignore absolutely everything you say.
- if one of the two isn't enough, just consider the other.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleAnd who told you that?
A sentence never begins with the word "and'.
Originally posted by @whodeyYeah - remember the year the OED omitted "gullible"?
LMAO!
I thought this was 100% believable.
Too sad.
Boy they sure felt stupid.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleBoth Garner’s Modern American Usage, and Fowler’s Modern English Usage
A sentence never begins with the word "and'.
call this belief a superstition. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary of English Usage
(or MWDEU) says, “Everybody agrees that it’s all right to begin a sentence with
and,” and notes that you can find examples of it all the way back to Old English.
https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/can-i-start-a-sentence-with-a-conjunction