Go back
Healthcare only to the highest bidder??

Healthcare only to the highest bidder??

Debates

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
28 Mar 20
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Should states have to enter bidding wars in order to secure badly needed medical supplies to save peoples lives? My home state of Washington is now doing just that, along with other states such as New York and Michigan. Last week, Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker told Trump he was denied three major orders of equipment because the feds had outbid him.

The right wing will be so proud of this, no Socialism here. Your chances of staying alive depends on your State's ability to pay. God bless American capitalism!




https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-cuomo-says-states-are-bidding-up-cost-of-supplies-2020-3

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
28 Mar 20

q

Joined
05 Sep 08
Moves
66636
Clock
28 Mar 20

@mchill said
Should states have to enter bidding wars in order to secure badly needed medical supplies to save peoples lives? My home state of Washington is now doing just that, along with other states such as New York and Michigan. Last week, Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker told Trump he was denied three major orders of equipment because the feds had outbid him.

The right wing will b ...[text shortened]... https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-cuomo-says-states-are-bidding-up-cost-of-supplies-2020-3
Obviously, it would be preferable if there was no shortage of necessary items. But given that there is no way to immediately prevent a shortage of a necessary item, there is absolutely nothing wrong with entities that are both using it to save lives to bid on it.

bunnyknight
bunny knight

planet Earth

Joined
12 Dec 13
Moves
2917
Clock
28 Mar 20

The post that was quoted here has been removed
With the wealth some people have, they'd have no trouble bribing God.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37394
Clock
28 Mar 20

@mchill said
Should states have to enter bidding wars in order to secure badly needed medical supplies to save peoples lives? My home state of Washington is now doing just that, along with other states such as New York and Michigan. Last week, Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker told Trump he was denied three major orders of equipment because the feds had outbid him.

The right wing will b ...[text shortened]... https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-cuomo-says-states-are-bidding-up-cost-of-supplies-2020-3
This why putting businessmen in charge of government is an inherently bad idea.

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
28 Mar 20
4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@quackquack said
Obviously, it would be preferable if there was no shortage of necessary items. But given that there is no way to immediately prevent a shortage of a necessary item, there is absolutely nothing wrong with entities that are both using it to save lives to bid on it.
there is absolutely nothing wrong with entities that are both using it to save lives to bid on it.



Oh Really? The Federal government is now bidding against individual states for these supplies. Who's side are they on - Mr. Dimwit?

The right of one to continue living is now being decided by state and corporate bean counters, and if you're found guilty of some inconvenient law, you pay a monetary fine (without admitting guilt) chalk it up as the cost of doing business, raise your prices accordingly, and start it all over again. God bless Conservative America. You people are sick!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.