The post that was quoted here has been removedFrom the article:
"The Post’s decisions about Sonmez seem to have been motivated largely by
social media pressures and the fear of bad press".
As I said, I don't know if we can conclude "misogyny" here.
However, I do agree that being a victim of sexual assault doesn't *necessarily* mean biased reporting. Unless there's objective reason to conclude bias, such as faulty reporting, I don't think the Post should've barred her.