http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/low-richardson-pegs-middle-class-making/
For the second time in a week, a prominent Democrat has downgraded Barack Obama's definition of the middle class -- leading Republicans to question whether he'll stick to his promise not to raise taxes on anyone making under $250,000.
Originally posted by generalissimoFrom the article:
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/low-richardson-pegs-middle-class-making/
For the second time in a week, a prominent Democrat has downgraded Barack Obama's definition of the middle class -- leading Republicans to question whether he'll stick to his promise not to raise taxes on anyone making under $250,000.
There's no indication that Obama has changed his tax policy, which states that anyone making under $200,000 would get a tax cut under his administration, and nobody making under $250,000 would be hit with a tax increase.
More desperation, non-stories and lies from the soon to be losers.
Originally posted by generalissimoBelieve it -- should The One get elected, even people making $40,000 a year will see their taxes go up because there is no way for Obama to "spread the wealth" only by increasing taxes for people making over $250,000 a year. In order to pay for his ambitious (I call them stupid) social welfare programs, Obama will have to revise that figure to include people earning $150,000 per year, then $100,000 a year, and finally, $40,000 a year. The good news is that the public will quickly realize they made a horrible mistake electing these Democrats to run the country and move quickly to throw them all out of office during the next election cycle.
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/low-richardson-pegs-middle-class-making/
For the second time in a week, a prominent Democrat has downgraded Barack Obama's definition of the middle class -- leading Republicans to question whether he'll stick to his promise not to raise taxes on anyone making under $250,000.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterDo you always feel it necessary to publicize the contents of your wet dreams?
Believe it -- should The One get elected, even people making $40,000 a year will see their taxes go up because there is no way for Obama to "spread the wealth" only by increasing taxes for people making over $250,000 a year. In order to pay for his ambitious (I call them stupid) social welfare programs, Obama will have to revise that figure to in ...[text shortened]... n the country and move quickly to throw them all out of office during the next election cycle.
Originally posted by generalissimoThis is pretty typical stuff from liberals. He's got nothing to add to the discussion because he knows I'm right and he and the other Obamanations don't want to tip their hand before they get into office.
what the hell are you talking about?
expressing your opinion is ''publicising the contents of your wet dreams''?!?!
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterLike you've never spouted off the same line of garbage. You're a frickin Angel dsr.
This is pretty typical stuff from liberals. He's got nothing to add to the discussion because he knows I'm right and he and the other Obamanations don't want to tip their hand before they get into office.
😞
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterThere's nothing to add to your fantasy about Republicans sweeping back into office in 2010 because Obama raised taxes on everybody. It's a bizarre wet dream bereft of any factual basis.
This is pretty typical stuff from liberals. He's got nothing to add to the discussion because he knows I'm right and he and the other Obamanations don't want to tip their hand before they get into office.
Originally posted by no1marauderStill, it's nice to see that even stalwarts such a DSR have conceded this election!
There's nothing to add to your fantasy about Republicans sweeping back into office in 2010 because Obama raised taxes on everybody. It's a bizarre wet dream bereft of any factual basis.
Don't bother voting this year, all you republicans....it's a lost cause!
