Go back
How Low Can It Go? Richardson Pegs Middle Class...

How Low Can It Go? Richardson Pegs Middle Class...

Debates

g

Pepperland

Joined
30 May 07
Moves
12892
Clock
31 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/low-richardson-pegs-middle-class-making/

For the second time in a week, a prominent Democrat has downgraded Barack Obama's definition of the middle class -- leading Republicans to question whether he'll stick to his promise not to raise taxes on anyone making under $250,000.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
31 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/low-richardson-pegs-middle-class-making/

For the second time in a week, a prominent Democrat has downgraded Barack Obama's definition of the middle class -- leading Republicans to question whether he'll stick to his promise not to raise taxes on anyone making under $250,000.
From the article:

There's no indication that Obama has changed his tax policy, which states that anyone making under $200,000 would get a tax cut under his administration, and nobody making under $250,000 would be hit with a tax increase.


More desperation, non-stories and lies from the soon to be losers.

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
31 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/31/low-richardson-pegs-middle-class-making/

For the second time in a week, a prominent Democrat has downgraded Barack Obama's definition of the middle class -- leading Republicans to question whether he'll stick to his promise not to raise taxes on anyone making under $250,000.
Believe it -- should The One get elected, even people making $40,000 a year will see their taxes go up because there is no way for Obama to "spread the wealth" only by increasing taxes for people making over $250,000 a year. In order to pay for his ambitious (I call them stupid) social welfare programs, Obama will have to revise that figure to include people earning $150,000 per year, then $100,000 a year, and finally, $40,000 a year. The good news is that the public will quickly realize they made a horrible mistake electing these Democrats to run the country and move quickly to throw them all out of office during the next election cycle.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
31 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Believe it -- should The One get elected, even people making $40,000 a year will see their taxes go up because there is no way for Obama to "spread the wealth" only by increasing taxes for people making over $250,000 a year. In order to pay for his ambitious (I call them stupid) social welfare programs, Obama will have to revise that figure to in ...[text shortened]... n the country and move quickly to throw them all out of office during the next election cycle.
Do you always feel it necessary to publicize the contents of your wet dreams?

g

Pepperland

Joined
30 May 07
Moves
12892
Clock
31 Oct 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Do you always feel it necessary to publicize the contents of your wet dreams?
what the hell are you talking about?

expressing your opinion is ''publicising the contents of your wet dreams''?!?!

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
Clock
01 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
what the hell are you talking about?

expressing your opinion is ''publicising the contents of your wet dreams''?!?!
This is pretty typical stuff from liberals. He's got nothing to add to the discussion because he knows I'm right and he and the other Obamanations don't want to tip their hand before they get into office.

u
The So Fist

Voice of Reason

Joined
28 Mar 06
Moves
9908
Clock
01 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
This is pretty typical stuff from liberals. He's got nothing to add to the discussion because he knows I'm right and he and the other Obamanations don't want to tip their hand before they get into office.
Like you've never spouted off the same line of garbage. You're a frickin Angel dsr.

😞

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
01 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
This is pretty typical stuff from liberals. He's got nothing to add to the discussion because he knows I'm right and he and the other Obamanations don't want to tip their hand before they get into office.
There's nothing to add to your fantasy about Republicans sweeping back into office in 2010 because Obama raised taxes on everybody. It's a bizarre wet dream bereft of any factual basis.

h

Cosmos

Joined
21 Jan 04
Moves
11184
Clock
01 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
There's nothing to add to your fantasy about Republicans sweeping back into office in 2010 because Obama raised taxes on everybody. It's a bizarre wet dream bereft of any factual basis.
Still, it's nice to see that even stalwarts such a DSR have conceded this election!

Don't bother voting this year, all you republicans....it's a lost cause!

ale1552

rural North Dakota

Joined
31 Oct 07
Moves
95775
Clock
01 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
Still, it's nice to see that even stalwarts such a DSR have conceded this election!

Don't bother voting this year, all you republicans....it's a lost cause!
Don't bother voting, you liberals, it's a done deal.

u
The So Fist

Voice of Reason

Joined
28 Mar 06
Moves
9908
Clock
02 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Do you always feel it necessary to publicize the contents of your wet dreams?
do you always feel it necessary to be such a loudmouth?

CliffLandin
Human

Burnsville, NC, USA

Joined
21 Nov 04
Moves
216864
Clock
02 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

It must be true 'cuz Sarah Palin said it was.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.