Go back
I feel sorry for wine connoisseurs!

I feel sorry for wine connoisseurs!

Debates

x

Joined
01 Sep 07
Moves
1848
Clock
20 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

...here I am, drinking a two dollar bottle of Charles Shaw Merlot (yeah, it's a bit sweet, but who the hell am I?), playing some decent chess against my computer, rambling on the internet, having a fine time...

It would be such a shame if it took a $50 bottle!

C
It is what it is

Pretoria

Joined
20 Apr 04
Moves
69107
Clock
20 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by xnomanx
It would be such a shame if it took a $50 bottle!
And your point is??

(a) Vintage wines should be cheaper
(b) You should be richer
(c) Plonk tastes not much different from vintage, anyway, who can tell the difference?
(d) All of the above

x

Joined
01 Sep 07
Moves
1848
Clock
20 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

D) All of the above

j

Joined
08 Sep 08
Moves
2040
Clock
20 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Enjoy your $2 bottle of nasty wine.

F

Joined
29 Dec 07
Moves
4184
Clock
20 Nov 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jlilly
Enjoy your $2 bottle of nasty wine.
Sounds like he is already!

I won't hear a word against cheap drink. It's made me the walking chess computer Adonis I am today!

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
20 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by xnomanx
...here I am, drinking a two dollar bottle of Charles Shaw Merlot (yeah, it's a bit sweet, but who the hell am I?), playing some decent chess against my computer, rambling on the internet, having a fine time...

It would be such a shame if it took a $50 bottle!
Two buck Chuck. No thanks. I prefer the more upscale wines in the seven to ten dollar range.

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
21 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Two buck Chuck. No thanks. I prefer the more upscale wines in the seven to ten dollar range.
Those are what I buy, too. But I thought they were the cheap wines.

I wouldn't even look at something that's $2 a bottle, assuming it would be like drinking Pabst beer or Canadian whiskey. The cheap stuff is not worth the price.

M

Joined
08 Oct 08
Moves
5542
Clock
25 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

it would be interesting to find out which are the best of the "cheap wines". I'm sure most cheap wines are lousy, but there are probably a few that are pretty good - that for some reason have been ignored by the critics because they don't come from an "elite vineyard" or something.

Also -- why doesn't anyone make a list of the top grape juices? -- I'm sure that some grape juice is a lot better than others. Or does the lack of alcohol make grape juice inherently unworthy of critical analysis? It would be interesting to whether the best grape juices tended to produce the best wines and vice versa.

b
Enigma

Seattle

Joined
03 Sep 06
Moves
3298
Clock
27 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by xnomanx
...here I am, drinking a two dollar bottle of Charles Shaw Merlot (yeah, it's a bit sweet, but who the hell am I?), playing some decent chess against my computer, rambling on the internet, having a fine time...

It would be such a shame if it took a $50 bottle!
What can I say...It's a world gone mad!! 🙄

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
29 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

do they still make thunderbird?

zeeblebot

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
Clock
29 Nov 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
do they still make thunderbird?
😲😲😲😲😲

http://news.yahoo.com/comics/boondocks;_ylt=ArtcRcNLnIGh3zWcEPdpOtcNVIV4

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.