@jj-adams saidInefficient for your purposes you'd probably get better results choosing racist Hispanics over random Anglos
I have no idea who the candidates are or their positions on stuff, so I simplified things:
1. Vote for all Republicans.
2. If there's more than one Republican, I voted for the ones with an Anglo name.
3. If they all were Anglo, I voted for the male over the female.
Whatchoo guys think of my system?
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@athousandyoung saidRacist Hispanics?
Inefficient for your purposes you'd probably get better results choosing racist Hispanics over random Anglos
You mean the ones that are all gaga over La Raza ?
@athousandyoung saidEither one is sufficient. 😉
Inefficient for your purposes you'd probably get better results choosing racist Hispanics over random Anglos
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@athousandyoung saidSounds good to me, glad to see there are so many far-right Hispanics, glad to have them on board with what's right for this country.
No like these ones:
https://www.axios.com/2022/03/10/rise-white-nationalist-hispanics-latinos
@jj-adams saidLeftist voting strategy.
I have no idea who the candidates are or their positions on stuff, so I simplified things:
1. Vote for all Republicans.
2. If there's more than one Republican, I voted for the ones with an Anglo name.
3. If they all were Anglo, I voted for the male over the female.
Whatchoo guys think of my system?
Free country though.
1 edit
@jj-adams saidHow can you be sure they were really male ? Were birth certificates presented for public inspection ?
I have no idea who the candidates are or their positions on stuff, so I simplified things:
1. Vote for all Republicans.
2. If there's more than one Republican, I voted for the ones with an Anglo name.
3. If they all were Anglo, I voted for the male over the female.
Whatchoo guys think of my system?
@jj-adams saidWow, it's as racist, as sexist and as stupid as you!
I have no idea who the candidates are or their positions on stuff, so I simplified things:
1. Vote for all Republicans.
2. If there's more than one Republican, I voted for the ones with an Anglo name.
3. If they all were Anglo, I voted for the male over the female.
Whatchoo guys think of my system?
Amazing!
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@moonbus saidWhat makes you think birth certificates are good enough? They never accepted Obama's, why would they accept a hand-written scrap of paper from an Appalachian candidate? Drop trou, man, prove it and drop trou!
How can you be sure they were really male ? Were birth certificates presented for public inspection ?
@shallow-blue saidOnce Obama’s typewritten original birth certificate was found most of the birthers backed down. A lot of them were just suspicious that a man born long before computers had a computer generated birth certificate.
What makes you think birth certificates are good enough? They never accepted Obama's, why would they accept a hand-written scrap of paper from an Appalachian candidate? Drop trou, man, prove it and drop trou!
@shallow-blue saidSince when can Appalachians write? I don’t think Evangelical missionaries have penetrated that far yet.
What makes you think birth certificates are good enough? They never accepted Obama's, why would they accept a hand-written scrap of paper from an Appalachian candidate? Drop trou, man, prove it and drop trou!
Come to think of it, candidates should probably also submit standardized psychological test results, just to make sure they are correctly self-identifying as whatever they say they are. I mean, we can’t have any perv-men creeping into women’s rest rooms once they get to Capitol Hill. That would bring down democracy.