06 Dec 13
1 edit
Originally posted by KazetNagorraIf there is high income equality, where is there to mobilise to?
High income equality, high social mobility. That's what you were looking for, right?
KN: "Right guys it's very easy to mobilise here."
The guys: "Where we going KN?"
KN: "Um, bout an 1/8 of a 1/16th of booger all, that way."
🙄
06 Dec 13
Originally posted by WajomaYou have a good point there, Wajoma. In Iceland, already one of the wealthiest countries in the world, the rich are really suffering. I'll light an extra candle for them today.
If there is high income equality, where is there to mobilise to?
KN: "Right guys it's very easy to mobilise here."
The guys: "Where we going KN?"
KN: "Um, bout an 1/8 of a 1/16th of booger all, that way."
🙄
06 Dec 13
Originally posted by KazetNagorraI know it was a good point, can't have high mobility and high equality, just so much more BS innit.
You have a good point there, Wajoma. In Iceland, already one of the wealthiest countries in the world, the rich are really suffering. I'll light an extra candle for them today.
06 Dec 13
Originally posted by WajomaOn the contrary, one can have both. I suggest obtaining a rudimentary understanding of these concepts. You might combine this with a crash course in basic economics.
I know it was a good point, can't have high mobility and high equality, just so much more BS innit.