Go back
IF China Balloon Is Really For Weather

IF China Balloon Is Really For Weather

Debates


@jj-adams said
The information is there for you to google, help yourself.
This is the second time you have copped out. I am now outright calling you a liar.
You have no source of information.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
This is the second time you have copped out. I am now outright calling you a liar.
You have no source of information.
The Gary Powers incident:

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/u2-incident

https://www.military.com/history/francis-gary-powers-one-man-two-countries.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
The Gary Powers incident:

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/u2-incident

https://www.military.com/history/francis-gary-powers-one-man-two-countries.html
Post the relevant excerpts.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Post the relevant excerpts.
Read them for yourself.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said


I could have taken it down with a twelve gauge shotgun for a lot less and without destroying the evidence.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2023/02/03/when-weather-balloon-went-rogue-two-decades-ago-fighter-jets-fired-it-couldnt-bring-it-down.html

Here, a summary of the relevant bit for you : in a previous incident, two Canadian fighter jets intercepted and tried and failed to bring down a rogue weather balloon, firing over 1,000 machine gun rounds at it.


Fat chance, you with your shot gun, standing on yer back lawn. 😆

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2023/02/03/when-weather-balloon-went-rogue-two-decades-ago-fighter-jets-fired-it-couldnt-bring-it-down.html

Here, a summary of the relevant bit for you : in a previous incident, two Canadian fighter jets intercepted and tried and failed to bring down a rogue weather balloon, firing over 1,000 machine gun rounds at it.


Fat chance, you with your shot gun, standing on yer back lawn. 😆
And the one spotted above Latin America? Explain that? Is China spying on Latin America? Just how far should the paranoia go? It is very hard for me to believe that China sees Latin America as a threat.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
And the one spotted above Latin America? Explain that? Is China spying on Latin America? Just how far should the paranoia go? It is very hard for me to believe that China sees Latin America as a threat.
Maybe the Chinese are just nosey. 🤔

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
Maybe the Chinese are just nosey. 🤔
Maybe. They would not be the first to be nosey.
Remember when there was a mysterious crash on the moon and nobody admitted it was theirs? The head NASA guy got all paranoid China was doing something in secret on the far side of the moon and literally accused China of trying to take over the moon. So the NASA sent a space craft to orbit the moon and see what may or may not be going on there by China.

No word on anything China is doing on the moon yet. Unjustified paranoia?

https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/who-crashed-on-the-moon.193716

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
This is the second time you have copped out. I am now outright calling you a liar.
You have no source of information.
Even after Marauder posted this for you?
So typical of your sort to call someone a liar after they were proven wrong.
"Francis Gary Powers was shot down over the Soviet Union 60 years ago today on May 1, 1960. His U-2 spy plane was hit by an SA-2 Guideline surface-to-air missile, one of 14 fired at him as he flew at approximately 70,500 ft. over Sverdlovsk. "

https://theaviationist.com/2020/05/01/shot-down-60-years-ago-today-we-visit-gary-powers-u-2-in-moscow-now/

Vote Up
Vote Down

@jj-adams said
Even after Marauder posted this for you?
So typical of your sort to call someone a liar after they were proven wrong.
"Francis Gary Powers was shot down over the Soviet Union 60 years ago today on May 1, 1960. His U-2 spy plane was hit by an SA-2 Guideline surface-to-air missile, one of 14 fired at him as he flew at approximately 70,500 ft. over Sverdlovsk. "

https://theaviationist.com/2020/05/01/shot-down-60-years-ago-today-we-visit-gary-powers-u-2-in-moscow-now/
I didn't call no1 a liar. He posted his source. You didn't.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder
I was just wondering about something. How can that equipment hanging from the bottom of that balloon stay still enough to take pictures at the right places? You would think it would rock back and forth and maybe even spin around while being pushed in the jet stream.


@metal-brain said
I didn't call no1 a liar. He posted his source. You didn't.
OMG you are hopeless.
Marauder pointed out that what I said was correct, and you called me a liar afterwards.
You had to be trolling at that point.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@jj-adams said
OMG you are hopeless.
Marauder pointed out that what I said was correct, and you called me a liar afterwards.
You had to be trolling at that point.
No, I called you a liar before he posted that. You refused to post your source twice in a row. no1 did what you failed to do.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/chinese-spy-balloon-story-manufactured-crisis-alternative-reading

The Pentagon itself said that “the payload wouldn’t offer much in the way of surveillance that China couldn’t collect through spy satellites” and that “the balloon posed no serious physical or intelligence threat”.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/02/03/how-spy-balloons-work/

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
@no1marauder
I was just wondering about something. How can that equipment hanging from the bottom of that balloon stay still enough to take pictures at the right places? You would think it would rock back and forth and maybe even spin around while being pushed in the jet stream.
Ever hear of shutter speed? 1/1000 of a second exposure will cancel out the motion of a balloon in flight.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@moonbus said
Ever hear of shutter speed? 1/1000 of a second exposure will cancel out the motion of a balloon in flight.
No, I have not. What is your source of information?

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/chinese-spy-balloon-story-manufactured-crisis-alternative-reading

The Pentagon itself said that “the payload wouldn’t offer much in the way of surveillance that China couldn’t collect through spy satellites” and that “the balloon posed no serious physical or intelligence threat”.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.