Originally posted by shavixmirWe could also have a Never Engages In Debate And Instead Just Drops In To Make a Comment Because He Doesn't Know Anything About Anything Award.
Very cool idea!
In fact, if someone's being really obnoxious we could give them the Rush Limbaugh award. Yet, if they continue for months after months without seeing the light we can give them the Merk life-time achievement award.
Originally posted by jammerIts my mistake jammer I forgot to realise that if a sentence is too long you have difficulties. i will try to explain.
from the OP ...
"The continual paranoia exhibited by jammer and Seitse, leads them into this labelling people with views that are completely opposite with the ones they clearly state."
..........................
Liberal hypocricy in action .. "label" me as paranoid while in the same sentense accuse me of "labelling people"
2nd post by the OP ..
...... ...[text shortened]... shattered yet .. take a look at yourself bro .. check-up from the neck-up
the problem is not with labelling people.
the problem is not with spelling.
it is with labelling people INCORRECTLY (boy do you need those CAPITALS in place). Try going back and reading the sentence slowly, read the words out loud if it helps. My primary school used to advise moving your finger along the text. Read it over and over again. Maybe just maybe you might understand.
There are minor points like: someone can do something idiotic and still not be an idiot. So be careful when assuming labels. But logic and jammer never seem to go well together i will only confuse you with this.
I understand that intelligent tests are different for different levels of intelligence. Clearly you have a very close link spelling = intelligence. It was like that for me in the first grade as well. Unfortunately I see it different now i've grown up, but I respect your view. Lucky Einstein never had you as a friend.
Einstein couldn't spell therefore Einstein stupid, nice.
Originally posted by petrosianpupilThanks for the condesention, it fits your style well, self-defining one might say.
Its my mistake jammer I forgot to realise that if a sentence is too long you have difficulties. i will try to explain.
the problem is not with labelling people.
the problem is not with spelling.
it is with labelling people INCORRECTLY (boy do you need those CAPITALS in place). Try going back and reading the sentence slowly, read the words ou ...[text shortened]... nstein never had you as a friend.
Einstein couldn't spell therefore Einstein stupid, nice.
A weak form of debate/argument .. but somehow, fitting for you.
I guess what you're saying is that when you label me .. it's correct (because you say so), but when I label you as a phony hypocrite .. it's incorrect (again, because you say so)
Good argument .. tight.
Where did you learn that .. the same primary school?
Einstien was pretty smart, but you really shouldn't use his name when trying to pump up your own dim image .. THAT would be stupid.
nice hee hee
Originally posted by jammerBetter jammer.
Thanks for the condesention, it fits your style well, self-defining one might say.
A weak form of debate/argument .. but somehow, fitting for you.
I guess what you're saying is that when you label me .. it's correct (because you say so), but when I label you as a phony hypocrite .. it's incorrect (again, because you say so)
Good argument .. tight.
W ...[text shortened]... his name when trying to pump up your own dim image .. THAT would be stupid.
nice hee hee
You understand why you were wrong about the spelling and the correct/incorrect labelling.
perhaps I might now introduce the next bit.
It was labelling incorrectly BY MAKING FALSE ILLOGICAL ASSUMPTIONS.
A false illogical assumption would be assuming i said that Einstein was a bad speller to make me look smart. This is not logical. It doesn't prove that bad spellers are smart. (I can see that in a vain attempt to look like Einstein you have been making plenty of mistakes yourself.) This is a VERY COMMON logical mistake. Carrots may be orange but not everything orange is a carrot. Read my post again (remember: speaking and the finger). The point was to show that bad spellers can be intelligent (oranges things might not be carrots) to assume otherwise would be stupid.
The second mistake is one you continually make. Just because i can say your labels are incorrect, then don't assume i expect that mine are correct. Again you fail to appreciate the nature of true and false. This surprises me
as I thought that as you practiced only the good/evil thinking and that binary was your talent in life.
A false assumption would be one where you state that i say your labelling me as a phony hypocrite is incorrect. I have said no such thing.
I am quite happy with your labels when they have a reason that you can rationalise in your limited capacity. I did say that I was happy with your label of me as stupid as you clearly link intelligence to spelling. I am a bad speller, guilty as charged. Of course I see intelligence differently but I don't object to your view. In jammer world, if you can't spell you are stupid, you must have low self esteem then?
This next point is a little easier "condesention" is a weak form of debate!!!!! and you call me a hypocrite!!!!
So to recap,
Its not the labelling
Its not even the labelling incorrectly
its the labelling incorrectly by making false illogical assumptions.
WE ARE NEARLY THERE JUST ONE MORE TO GO>
Originally posted by petrosianpupilYou're really hung up on the spelling and the gay stuff huh?
Better jammer.
You understand why you were wrong about the spelling and the correct/incorrect labelling.
perhaps I might now introduce the next bit.
It was labelling incorrectly BY MAKING FALSE ILLOGICAL ASSUMPTIONS.
A false illogical assumption would be assuming i said that Einstein was a bad speller to make me look smart. This is not l ...[text shortened]... rectly by making false illogical assumptions.
WE ARE NEARLY THERE JUST ONE MORE TO GO>
I have no idea what any of this last post of yours is about .. none, zero.
Just reads stpid to me.
I guess I embarassed you with my joke about your spelling of stupid, stupid .. oops, sorry. My bad.
The condesention thing i'll give you, you're good at that. Hey, if it helps you look in the mirror i'm all for it, no point in beating yourself up about it really.
What was that about illogical assumptions? you were yelling and it was hard to make out what your point might have been. Try to slow down a little, you're stepping on your dick again.
But I thought you might be catching on just a little when you posted this ...
"A false assumption would be one where you state that i say your labelling me as a phony hypocrite is incorrect. I have said no such thing."
I get it.. YOU'RE saying you're a phony hypocrite.
or am I assuming too much here?
BTW .. are "false illogical assumptions" only those that you define as such? Seems to be what you're saying
Originally posted by jammerIts OK jammer I didn't expect you to understand. Unfortunately you backed up you admission with yet another mistake.
You're really hung up on the spelling and the gay stuff huh?
I have no idea what any of this last post of yours is about .. none, zero.
Just reads stpid to me.
I guess I embarassed you with my joke about your spelling of stupid, stupid .. oops, sorry. My bad.
The condesention thing i'll give you, you're good at that. Hey, if it helps you look in the mi ...[text shortened]... ical assumptions" only those that you define as such? Seems to be what you're saying
I don't normally comment on what you label me as they are not normally very nice labels. As your evidence lacks reason, I see no need to bother to acknowledge it.
i just tend to think that you produce these labels because you don't understand the argument or can't bring your self to admit your mistakes.
I tend to assume the more insults -> the more jammer knows he is being stipid. I see them as an unthinking reaction. I see many yobs in Britain that have the similar thought. Swear a bit and I'm part of the gang.
I think that it is because you are angry at being rejected and lonely in the past.
I don't really blame you, it is the only way you can cope.
Spelling as I said before is a hangup of mine, the gay thing is definitely yours. I am very happy with my sexuality, you on the other hand have big problems. you don't have to be a psychologist to realise that.