Go back
Illegal to abort a bird

Illegal to abort a bird

Debates


but legal to abort a human. This shyt is bassakwards.

“All swallows are state and federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. It is illegal for any person to take, possess, transport, sell, or purchase them or their parts, such as feathers, nests, or eggs, without a permit. Active nests with eggs or chicks inside may not be touched or destroyed without a permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Inactive (empty) nests do not require a permit to destroy. Nest or bird removal applications must be justified with strong, compelling reasons such as a health or safety hazard towards humans and/or birds or damage to property. Check with your state government and the Service for migratory bird permits. The Service does not issue permits for bird nuisance issues.”

https://www.fws.gov/story/nuisance-swallows


@mott-the-hoople said
but legal to abort a human. This shyt is bassakwards.

“All swallows are state and federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. It is illegal for any person to take, possess, transport, sell, or purchase them or their parts, such as feathers, nests, or eggs, without a permit. Active nests with eggs or chicks inside may not be touched or destroyed ...[text shortened]... ice does not issue permits for bird nuisance issues.”

https://www.fws.gov/story/nuisance-swallows
There is no law against mother birds killing their offspring.


@mott-the-hoople said
but legal to abort a human. This shyt is bassakwards.

“All swallows are state and federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. It is illegal for any person to take, possess, transport, sell, or purchase them or their parts, such as feathers, nests, or eggs, without a permit. Active nests with eggs or chicks inside may not be touched or destroyed ...[text shortened]... ice does not issue permits for bird nuisance issues.”

https://www.fws.gov/story/nuisance-swallows
heh it fills me with great joy the fact that you think this retarded argument does anything but paint you as a retard.

Such wonderful cocky innocence and stupidity is rarely found outside 2 year old children


@mott-the-hoople said
but legal to abort a human. This shyt is bassakwards.

“All swallows are state and federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. It is illegal for any person to take, possess, transport, sell, or purchase them or their parts, such as feathers, nests, or eggs, without a permit. Active nests with eggs or chicks inside may not be touched or destroyed ...[text shortened]... ice does not issue permits for bird nuisance issues.”

https://www.fws.gov/story/nuisance-swallows
1) Those eggs are not inside the mother
2) That would be someone else making the decision, not the mother

Your post doesn't apply.


@mott-the-hoople said
but legal to abort a human. This shyt is bassakwards.

“All swallows are state and federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. It is illegal for any person to take, possess, transport, sell, or purchase them or their parts, such as feathers, nests, or eggs, without a permit. Active nests with eggs or chicks inside may not be touched or destroyed ...[text shortened]... ice does not issue permits for bird nuisance issues.”

https://www.fws.gov/story/nuisance-swallows
I mean you gotta know right? You know this is insane.


@zahlanzi said
heh it fills me with great joy the fact that you think this retarded argument does anything but paint you as a retard.

Such wonderful cocky innocence and stupidity is rarely found outside 2 year old children
C'mon, give the guy some credit.
.....Don't you mean to say 4 year olds?


@mott-the-hoople said
but legal to abort a human. This shyt is bassakwards.

“All swallows are state and federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. It is illegal for any person to take, possess, transport, sell, or purchase them or their parts, such as feathers, nests, or eggs, without a permit. Active nests with eggs or chicks inside may not be touched or destroyed ...[text shortened]... ice does not issue permits for bird nuisance issues.”

https://www.fws.gov/story/nuisance-swallows
Many types of birds routinely throw the third chick
out of the nest to perish....under the mother's watchful eye.


@mott-the-hoople said
but legal to abort a human. This shyt is bassakwards.

“All swallows are state and federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. It is illegal for any person to take, possess, transport, sell, or purchase them or their parts, such as feathers, nests, or eggs, without a permit. Active nests with eggs or chicks inside may not be touched or destroyed ...[text shortened]... ice does not issue permits for bird nuisance issues.”

https://www.fws.gov/story/nuisance-swallows
How did you come upon this piece of information ??
Did this actually embrace when you woke up this morning ?
Or did you actually go out looking for something like this ?
Or maybe just a bird dropping landed on your mullet ?


@mott-the-hoople said
but legal to abort a human. This shyt is bassakwards.

“All swallows are state and federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918. It is illegal for any person to take, possess, transport, sell, or purchase them or their parts, such as feathers, nests, or eggs, without a permit. Active nests with eggs or chicks inside may not be touched or destroyed ...[text shortened]... ice does not issue permits for bird nuisance issues.”

https://www.fws.gov/story/nuisance-swallows
Oh, good fukking grief.
Most has already been said.

However, on a side note, birds can’t be illegal aliens either.


@shavixmir said
Oh, good fukking grief.
Most has already been said.

However, on a side note, birds can’t be illegal aliens either.
on a main note, no one said they were. why are you so triggered?


Speaking about wildlife preservation and such, remember just before the 2020 election when all the media exclaimed "Trump OK's Killing of Wolves, Removes Them from Endangered Species List"?
It was an OLD story from 6 months earlier, and the decision to remove wolves from the endangered species list was a GOOD thing. It meant they had returned in large numbers, and it wasn't Trump's call, it was the US Dept of Fish and Game that did it.
Trump could save a drowning child and the media would say it with the headline "Trump is Starving Sharks by Denying Them Food".


@jj-adams said
Speaking about wildlife preservation and such, remember just before the 2020 election when all the media exclaimed "Trump OK's Killing of Wolves, Removes Them from Endangered Species List"?
It was an OLD story from 6 months earlier, and the decision to remove wolves from the endangered species list was a GOOD thing. It meant they had returned in large numbers, and it wasn' ...[text shortened]... child and the media would say it with the headline "Trump is Starving Sharks by Denying Them Food".
these libs are not for womens tights at all…actually they are erasing the female of the species. To them a female can have a full beard with 12” hanging


@mott-the-hoople said
these libs are not for womens tights at all…
I am 100% percent for that. Her booty, her choice.


@mott-the-hoople said
on a main note, no one said they were. why are you so triggered?
Because you are so anti-illegal immigration.

You use birds as an example against abortion (unwittingly stupidly at that), but if you draw your thesis one step further, then birds would be an argument pro-illegal immigration.

So, foot, own, shot.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
Oh, good fukking grief.
Most has already been said.

However, on a side note, birds can’t be illegal aliens either.
'Alleen de vogels vliegen van West naar Oost Berlijn'