http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7264090.stm
A US National Intelligence Estimate released last December said Tehran had frozen its atomic programme in 2003.
But documents presented to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) suggest the work continued.
,,,
Simon Smith, Britain's ambassador to the IAEA, said material presented to the IAEA in Vienna came from multiple sources and included designs for a nuclear warhead, plus information on how it would perform and how it would fit onto a missile.
"Certainly some of the dates that we were talking about... went beyond 2003," he said.
...
But Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad retorted that no amount of UN sanctions would deter Tehran from its nuclear path.
"If they want to continue with that path of sanctions, we will not be harmed. They can issue resolutions for 100 years," he said in a televised interview on Saturday.
Originally posted by BogleThink you might be confusing Shavi with someone else......
If you were half as actively useful as the average Israeli citizen you would not be living on 'benefits' in Glasgow.
Or is 'living on benefits in Glasgow' a term you apply to everyone who doesn't share your warped view of the world?
Originally posted by shavixmirthe first country to use nuclear bombs on another will be flatten by the rest.
Maybe they'll just flatten Israel and create peace in the Middle East?
chinese, american, russian nukes will come raining down on iran. even n korea might join with its coal powered nuke. it will be delivered on the back of a donkey.
you cannot allow a country, any country to use nukes on any other country. it was semi-ok at hiroshima but now any use of nuclear bombs must be dealt with harshly. russia might not think of supporting america against iran, but if iran uses nukes, the deals are off
Originally posted by Redmikei think he wanted to call you a tree hugging flower sniffing hippie. aren't you gonna smack him?
Think you might be confusing Shavi with someone else......
Or is 'living on benefits in Glasgow' a term you apply to everyone who doesn't share your warped view of the world?
Originally posted by RedmikeIt's you. Mikey. who has the warped view with your pipe-dream of a communist society without any rulers, where all are happily living on benefits as soon as the SSP takes over.
Think you might be confusing Shavi with someone else......
Or is 'living on benefits in Glasgow' a term you apply to everyone who doesn't share your warped view of the world?
Originally posted by AThousandYoungSounds like Redmike's dream of a communist environment. Apparently one must not call it a 'State' since, according to Mikey, there will no rulers.
And Iran will 100 years from now still be a sorry second rate nation because the leadership is insane and because they're cut off from the world economy.