Go back
is BUSH a war criminal?

is BUSH a war criminal?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Should George Bush be tried and sent to prison for attacking Iraq without any provocation.
Did he lie intentionally so he could attack Iraq?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steponup
Should George Bush be tried and sent to prison for attacking Iraq without any provocation.
Did he lie intentionally so he could attack Iraq?
I'd answer this question but its too ridiculous to waste the time. You have a good day

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steponup
Should George Bush be tried and sent to prison for attacking Iraq without any provocation.
Did he lie intentionally so he could attack Iraq?
No, war criminals are on the losing side of the war.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steponup
Should George Bush be tried and sent to prison for attacking Iraq without any provocation.
Did he lie intentionally so he could attack Iraq?
Better check the constitution.

Politicians are allowed to lie.

Why do you think everyone calls them lying @#$%^& *()_+_) politicians.

Granny.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steponup
Should George Bush be tried and sent to prison for attacking Iraq without any provocation.
Did he lie intentionally so he could attack Iraq

Only a left wing moonbat would suggest that. Get some new talking points, that one is ridiculous.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by slappy115
No, war criminals are on the losing side of the war.
Lol.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steponup
Should George Bush be tried and sent to prison for attacking Iraq without any provocation.
Did he lie intentionally so he could attack Iraq?
I think he should be tried.

It's then up to a judge to decide his fate.

His motivation for attacking Iraq has never been truly justified. Smearing links Iraq with terrorist activity was unjustifiable.
WMD? was plain wrong.

Saddam did not threaten America or her interests.
Rumsfeld has even more to answer to.

I always wondered what the US was trying to achieve - I'm still wondering.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steponup
Should George Bush be tried and sent to prison for attacking Iraq without any provocation.
Did he lie intentionally so he could attack Iraq?
Of course he did, and I hope he'll only be remembered for the lousy
scoundrel he is. Having said that, the man has also given us lots of good
laughs. You gotta love the clown.

So, let's hope he'll always be remembered for the clown he is, also. 😕

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SMSBear716
I'd answer this question but its too ridiculous to waste the time. You have a good day
seconded

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steponup
Should George Bush be tried and sent to prison for attacking Iraq without any provocation.
Did he lie intentionally so he could attack Iraq?
I think the question you should be asking is, "will he ever be tried"...me thinks not

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by steponup
Should George Bush be tried and sent to prison for attacking Iraq without any provocation.
Did he lie intentionally so he could attack Iraq?
Should all the permenant members of the UN Security Council be tried for falsely accusing Saddam of manufacturing WMD - which they followed by over a dozen resolutions against Iraq then approving action against Saddam when he threw the UN inspectors out of Iraq?

Aye...hang the lot!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by slappy115
No, war criminals are on the losing side of the war.
excellent put. the winning side only has heroes