Go back
Is Homosexuality Genetic?

Is Homosexuality Genetic?

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

or learned?

for example, gay guys are generally caregiving, neat and good-looking. what does this tell us?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by EmLasker
or learned?

for example, gay guys are generally caregiving, neat and good-looking. what does this tell us?
Let me guess, your gay right?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by EmLasker
or learned?

for example, gay guys are generally caregiving, neat and good-looking. what does this tell us?
In prisons or other artificial single-sex populations, it is learned.

In society, it is probably an adverse mutation because it tends to interfere with reproductive success.

edit: I never thought about the fact that being neat and good-looking would help them attract a female mate -- until that mate found out. Maybe that sort of pressure is what keeps the mutation from dying out -- they manage to "bait and switch" with enough females to keep going.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by EmLasker
or learned?

for example, gay guys are generally caregiving, neat and good-looking. what does this tell us?
Good looking??? Gays are no less self-serving than the rest of society; after all, they are just as human as the rest of us. They may be neater than a typical male slob, but that's because the feminine side of fastidiousness takes over.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by EmLasker
or learned?

for example, gay guys are generally caregiving, neat and good-looking. what does this tell us?
A true fruitcake does not reproduce so how can it be genetic?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by EmLasker
or learned?

for example, gay guys are generally caregiving, neat and good-looking. what does this tell us?
Homosexuality is an abomination, therefore it is not natural. How do I know? The Bible tells me so. I know this isn't the spiritual forums, but you asked, and my opinion is referenced in the 'Good Book'. Now, I don't dislike gays, so don't assume that I'm a homophobe. I would give my last dollar to a homeless-homo. The decent thing to do is hate the sin but love the sinner. Put this in your thesis and watch your professor blow a gasket...LOL

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by EmLasker
or learned?

for example, gay guys are generally caregiving, neat and good-looking. what does this tell us?
That they have more estrogen that the average male.

Vote Up
Vote Down

There is a debate about this on the Science forum, where a possible evolutionary explanation is also given.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nighthawk62
A true fruitcake does not reproduce so how can it be genetic?
homosexuals in many ways are bisexuals, so they can still give offsprings

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dystoniac
Homosexuality is an abomination, therefore it is not natural. How do I know? The Bible tells me so. I know this isn't the spiritual forums, but you asked, and my opinion is referenced in the 'Good Book'. Now, I don't dislike gays, so don't assume that I'm a homophobe. I would give my last dollar to a homeless-homo. The decent thing to do is hate the ...[text shortened]... but love the sinner. Put this in your thesis and watch your professor blow a gasket...LOL
The Bible also says they should be killed. Would you do that because the Bible says to?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
The Bible also says they should be killed. Would you do that because the Bible says to?
Killed by whom? Where in the Bible does it say to kill homosexuals? The Qu'ran might incite their followers to kill homos, but Jesus never stated that gays should be killed. If the Old testament mentions the smiting of queers, then God alone has the authority to do so. Jesus came and made the Old Testament irrelavent. God smited them in Sodom and Gamorrah because it is an abomination and is completely unacceptable to God. Jesus teaches to love all people, including one's enemies, so I love atheists and gays.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dystoniac
Jesus came and made the Old Testament irrelavent.
Then on what basis are you saying that homosexuality is an abomination and is completely unacceptable to "God"?

Homesexuals are unacceptable to "God". And yet Jesus teaches you to love them. I thought Christians were monotheists.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Then on what basis are you saying that homosexuality is an abomination and is completely unacceptable to "God"?

Homesexuals are unacceptable to "God". And yet Jesus teaches you to love them. I thought Christians were monotheists.
Jesus said on more than one occasion words to the effect of if any man has seen him he has seen the Father as well as saying that he and his Father were one. If anyone can accept the truth of th e bible or the notion of a creator God and then balk at the seeming incongruity of a trinity operating within the monotheistic Godhead, then they are simply being difficult.

Btw Jesus also said that he came not to abolish the law and the prophets, but that he came to fulfill them and he cautioned any who would argue differently. Jesus teaches us to love God and each other equally. Given that all have sinned and that Jesus had a problem with people who outwardly did the "right thing" but who had lust filled or hate filled hearts suggests that it was the sin that was the problem not the person. Now if everyone has sinned and fallen short of God's glory and if all sin is abhorrent to God, does this also suggest a conflicted Deity? No anything but. Read John 3:16 and try not to get caught up in Father-Son apparent incongruity.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
Jesus said on more than one occasion words to the effect of if any man has seen him he has seen the Father as well as saying that he and his Father were one. If anyone can accept the truth of th e bible or the notion of a creator God and then balk at the seeming incongruity of a trinity operating within the monotheistic Godhead, then they are simply being dif ...[text shortened]... anything but. Read John 3:16 and try not to get caught up in Father-Son apparent incongruity.
Sorry. You're addressing the wrong person here. I only responded to dystoniac because I believe him/her to be a purveyor of a particularly nasty brand hatespeech who is completely unable to substantiate any of the grotesque superstition-fuelled assertions he/she makes. I am not interested in theological discussions, except occasionally here in Indonesia where (by way of a bit of harmless intellectual amusement) I find my partially internalized (but now safely quarantined) Catholic "trinity operating within the monotheistic Godhead" thing gets ripped to shreds by educated Muslims. Mind you, I can drink all of them under the table in the process.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Sorry. You're addressing the wrong person here. I only responded to dystoniac because I believe him/her to be a purveyor of a particularly nasty brand hatespeech who is completely unable to substantiate any of the grotesque superstition-fuelled assertions he/she makes. I am not interested in theological discussions, except occasionally here in Indonesia where (b ...[text shortened]... shreds by educated Muslims. Mind you, I can drink all of them under the table in the process.
naughty muslims! But if it gets friends who stop over to stay the night....