Originally posted by no1marauderSo, on the one hand you are implying that Obama has little to do with the failing economy, yet on the other hand, he is responsible for outperforming previous economies?
IMO the effect a President has on the US economy is exaggerated; however this article shows that the economy under Obama has outperformed the economy under Reagan.http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2014/09/05/obama-outperforms-reagan-on-jobs-growth-and-investing/
Talk about having your cake and eat it to. That makes no sense.
I predict carnage this weak on Wall Street. And when it does, feel free to emphasize the notion that Obama polices have had nothing to do with it.
Originally posted by whodeyYou must have gotten a "F" in reading comprehension.
So, on the one hand you are implying that Obama has little to do with the failing economy, yet on the other hand, he is responsible for outperforming previous economies?
Talk about having your cake and eat it to. That makes no sense.
I predict carnage this weak on Wall Street. And when it does, feel free to emphasize the notion that Obama polices have had nothing to do with it.
