Israeli experts say Middle East safer with Sadd...

An interesting article...

http://www.forward.com/articles/israeli-experts-say-middle-east-was-safer-with-sad/

Claiming a criminal lunatic like Saddam Hussein should have been left in power for regional stability doesn't say much for the people of the middle east.
Unfortunatly, I agree, Saddam in power is preferable to what's going on now. He did keep order, didn't he?

Originally posted by Redmike
An interesting article...

http://www.forward.com/articles/israeli-experts-say-middle-east-was-safer-with-sad/

Originally posted by torch71
Little confused here, if you are boycotting Israel as in you last tread you started. Shouldn't you be boycotting their news as well?

Originally posted by Redmike
The purpose of a boycott is to have an economic effect.

Reading an online magazine doesn't generate funds to israel.

Originally posted by torch71
So you like the Israelies just not their goods. OK I got it.😉

Originally posted by Redmike
The purpose of a boycott is to have an economic effect.

Reading an online magazine doesn't generate funds to israel.

Originally posted by Redmike

Of course, it is always useful to know what the other side are thinking

Originally posted by Merk
Truer words have never been spoken.

Originally posted by shavixmir
Unless you're in opposition to Bush, then it's probably just a waste of bloody time.

Originally posted by Merk
Site hits do effect advertising or donations to a website. Looking at a site can in some small way generate revenue.

You will bloody well have to.
Its ok for you to not like Israels actions. But you dont need to support the Palestine either they send out their out 5 year old kids as Suecidebomber.
Yes its true.
You know what their is a sickness in the world its called: Blame it on Israel.
and you have it to.