28 Nov 06
Two conditions:
(1) The Palestinians must release the Israeli soldier, Cpl Gilad Shalit,
who was captured by militants in June.
(2) And they must set up a national-unity government committed to
recognising Israel and renouncing violence.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6188986.stm
Sounds civilized and reasonable, let's see if those 2 qualities are
mirrored by the other side.
28 Nov 06
Originally posted by SeitseDo the Palestinians get to set pre-conditions too?
Two conditions:
(1) The Palestinians must release the Israeli soldier, Cpl Gilad Shalit,
who was captured by militants in June.
(2) And they must set up a national-unity government committed to
recognising Israel and renouncing violence.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6188986.stm
Sounds civilized and reasonable, let's see if those 2 qualities are
mirrored by the other side.
Or would that be 'uncivilised' of them?
28 Nov 06
Originally posted by RedmikeLet's wait and see, Mikey. We will have answers for these questions in a few days.
Do the Palestinians get to set pre-conditions too?
Or would that be 'uncivilised' of them?
I do not like war (unlike you), so I really, really hope the middle east finds peace soon.
28 Nov 06
Originally posted by SeitseThis is absolutely reasonable, provided that:
Two conditions:
(1) The Palestinians must release the Israeli soldier, Cpl Gilad Shalit,
who was captured by militants in June.
(2) And they must set up a national-unity government committed to
recognising Israel and renouncing violence.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6188986.stm
Sounds civilized and reasonable, let's see if those 2 qualities are
mirrored by the other side.
1) Israel withdraws from the occupied territories and dismantles all illegal settlements.
2) Israel pledges never to invade Palestinian territory again.
Sound like a plan!
Let's get going!
28 Nov 06
Originally posted by SeitseFunny that you'd say that considering last time I tried mentioning the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict you accused me of being a wikipedia baby and copy pasting.
I simply love your insight and analysis depth.
Actually I didn't get any of my information from Wikipedia and I do know what I'm talking about.
And I do love how this thread has no actual debate posed in the first post.
28 Nov 06
Originally posted by SeitseLet’s not forget the Palestinians offered a truce and was flatly refused by Israel a few days ago. But now all of a sudden it is Israel that has offered a truce and accepted by the Palestinians.
Two conditions:
(1) The Palestinians must release the Israeli soldier, Cpl Gilad Shalit,
who was captured by militants in June.
(2) And they must set up a national-unity government committed to
recognising Israel and renouncing violence.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6188986.stm
Sounds civilized and reasonable, let's see if those 2 qualities are
mirrored by the other side.
28 Nov 06
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterYour ignorance is apparent again.
Preconditions of the so-called Palestinians:
1) All Jews in Israel must convert to Islam.
2) Those who do not must slit their throats or march into the sea.
Go find out what proportion of Palestinians are actually Muslims, and you'll understand how stupid your post is.