is this guy right?
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009/11/cru-gate-climate-conspiracy-or-much-ado.html#comments
eric144 said... 57
turboblocke #48
I am British too. My reading of modern history tells men that most of the major events were carried out in Britain while blaming the Americans.
For example. The destruction of the Russian economy apparently by Soros, Sache et al was really the work of the Rothschild family in Britain. That was revealed in The Times when Yukos boss Khodorkovsky went to jail and his shares defaulted to Lord Rothschild.
The Iraq war was fought on the basis of ridiculous MI6 lies who then blamed the Americans in the manufactured 'Downing Street document'. The Iranian foreign minister and government blame Britain for Iraq and the recent trouble in Iran, not the Americans. Blair (in a radio interview)said he took the Americans into Iraq, not the reverse.
The three banks who's fall started the financial crisis. Northern Rock, Lehman Brothers and AIG were brought down by British actions, despite Gordon Brown blaming it on local American difficulties. The AIG cds operation was run out of London in an orgy of regulation free criminal lunacy. The British government rejected a last minute Barclays bid for Lehmans on very trivial grounds. That finished it and triggered the global financial crisis.
Originally posted by zeeblebotOnly so much time...
is this guy right?
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2009/11/cru-gate-climate-conspiracy-or-much-ado.html#comments
eric144 said... 57
turboblocke #48
I am British too. My reading of modern history tells men that most of the major events were carried out in Britain while blaming the Americans.
For example. The destruction of the R ...[text shortened]... Lehmans on very trivial grounds. That finished it and triggered the global financial crisis.
GOOD EFFING GRIEF!
The MI6 dossier only carried weight in getting Britain to join the Iraq war. It had nothing to do with the Americans, Colin Powel and the UN or anyone else's involvement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_Dossier
The privately Blair-appointed Butler Commission, whose own report was issued after the aforementioned public investigation, concluded that the report Saddam's government was seeking uranium in Africa appeared credible:
a. It is accepted by all parties that Iraqi officials visited Niger in 1999.
b. The British government had intelligence from several different sources indicating that this visit was for the purpose of acquiring uranium. Since uranium constitutes almost three-quarters of Niger's exports, the intelligence was credible.
c. The evidence was not conclusive that Iraq actually purchased, as opposed to having sought, uranium, and the British government did not claim this.[8]
Originally posted by zeeblebot1. Launch a Public Enquiry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_Dossier
The privately Blair-appointed Butler Commission, whose own report was issued after the aforementioned public investigation, concluded that the report Saddam's government was seeking uranium in Africa appeared credible:
a. It is accepted by all parties that Iraqi officials visited Niger in 1999.
...[text shortened]... hased, as opposed to having sought, uranium, and the British government did not claim this.[8]
2. It makes a report with findings that politicians don't like
3. Politicians commission a Review of the report
4. The Terms Of Reference for this Review guarantee that the findings will be to the politicians' liking
5. The Review makes a report with findings that are to the politicians' liking
Originally posted by zeeblebotYes. I did.
did you understand a, b, c above?
But it seems you didn't understand my post.
Nor do you understand the British political machine. Apparently.
And nor do you realize the utter contempt in which the Butler Review was, and is, held.