07 Jan 09
Originally posted by Brother EdwinOnly seven edits for that shining example of middle-level brain function. In person, I don't think I could stop myself from punching you in the face.
We can root out who is really intellegent enough to have a right to vote by putting a extra question on the paper. They have to tick what film they think is better, lord of the rings or the scary movie films. If they the choose scary movies there vote dosent count.
07 Jan 09
Originally posted by irontigranThen they're in trouble and face disenfranchisement. I would say give them a last chance, an empty box, and ask them to write what they consider to be a good film in it. If they write "Glengarry Glen Ross" then they are allowed to vote.
what if they didnt know which one you were talking about?
07 Jan 09
Originally posted by Brother EdwinWhat if "they're" too stupid to know when to use "their" rather than "there", and don't know how to use apostrophes?
We can root out who is really intellegent enough to have a right to vote by putting a extra question on the paper. They have to tick what film they think is better, lord of the rings or the scary movie films. If they the choose scary movies there vote dosent count.
07 Jan 09
Originally posted by sasquatch672Its amazing that people are still falling for that gag. Why do you think it is that ALL of Brother Edwin's posts seem to have 7 edits?
Only seven edits for that shining example of middle-level brain function. In person, I don't think I could stop myself from punching you in the face.
10 Jan 09
Originally posted by rwingettI admit it. He got me. I think he's probably an astrophysicist or brain surgeon or even some alien being with vastly superior intelligence that for some reason beknownst only to him and God, likes to come on here and play stupid.
Its amazing that people are still falling for that gag. Why do you think it is that ALL of Brother Edwin's posts seem to have 7 edits?