- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@vivify saidMother Nature adds a little
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/12/13/pennsylvania-man-treated-covid-ivermectin-dies/6498445001/
A wife won a court battle so her husband can be treated with ivermectin by a hospital. Her husband died after his first dose. This happened just over a month ago.
Chlorine to the gene pool.
@vivify saidyou are one stupid pos. Ivermectin was not the cause of death…the woman sewed because the hospital would not administer Ivermectin. Ivermectin has been proven helpful when administered early on, the hospital prevented that.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/12/13/pennsylvania-man-treated-covid-ivermectin-dies/6498445001/
A wife won a court battle so her husband can be treated with ivermectin by a hospital. Her husband died after his first dose. This happened just over a month ago.
Read your own link fool.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@mott-the-hoople saidIvermectin is helpful.......
you are one stupid pos. Ivermectin was not the cause of death…the woman sewed because the hospital would not administer Ivermectin. Ivermectin has been proven helpful when administered early on, the hospital prevented that.
Read your own link fool.
IF YOU'RE AN ANIMAL WITH WORMS 😛
3 edits
@mott-the-hoople saidThe woman "sewed", Mott? Did she really "sew", you fukkin retard?
you are one stupid pos. Ivermectin was not the cause of death…the woman sewed because the hospital would not administer Ivermectin. Ivermectin has been proven helpful when administered early on, the hospital prevented that.
Read your own link fool.
From the article:
Keith Smith, whose wife had gone to court to have his COVID-19 infection treated with ivermectin, died Sunday evening, a week after he received his first dose of the controversial drug.
You are too stupid to debate.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@vivify saidOh, the irony..........
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2021/12/13/pennsylvania-man-treated-covid-ivermectin-dies/6498445001/
A wife won a court battle so her husband can be treated with ivermectin by a hospital. Her husband died after his first dose. This happened just over a month ago.
@mott-the-hoople saidWhy are you advocating people who have a deadly viral infection should take a horse de-wormer? Are you stupid too?
you are one stupid pos. Ivermectin was not the cause of death…the woman sewed because the hospital would not administer Ivermectin. Ivermectin has been proven helpful when administered early on, the hospital prevented that.
Read your own link fool.
It was a rhetorical question. We already know the answer.
@vivify said“ The woman "sewed", Mott? Did she really "sew", you fukkin retard?
The woman "sewed", Mott? Did she really "sew", you fukkin retard?
From the article:
Keith Smith, whose wife had gone to court to have his COVID-19 infection treated with ivermectin, died Sunday evening, a week after he received his first dose of the controversial drug.
You are too stupid to debate.
The articke clearly states the man died after ivermectin use, which the hospital only gave because the wife won a court battle.
You are too stupid to debate.”
I will tell you as soon as you tell me what an articke is.
1 edit
@suzianne saidsurely you are not stupid enough to think that is all ivermectin is used for…
Why are you advocating people who have a deadly viral infection should take a horse de-wormer? Are you stupid too?
It was a rhetorical question. We already know the answer.
“ Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). This result was confirmed in a trial sequential analysis using the same DerSimonian–Laird method that underpinned the unadjusted analysis. This was also robust against a trial sequential analysis using the Biggerstaff–Tweedie method. Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91😵. Secondary outcomes provided less certain evidence. Low-certainty evidence suggested that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for “need for mechanical ventilation,” whereas effect estimates for “improvement” and “deterioration” clearly favored ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare among treatment trials and evidence of no difference was assessed as low certainty. Evidence on other secondary outcomes was very low certainty.”
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/08000/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/
big pharma doesnt makd the big money off of ivermectin the way it can the vaccines. Dems really know how to play you lib fools.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidNo, it's also used to take Trump-level morons out of the gene pool. With, as proven in casu, quite effectively.
surely you are not stupid enough to think that is all ivermectin is used for…
May there be many more such.