21 Dec '12 16:16>1 edit
Bore them into submission, baby.
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-john-kerry-state-20121221,0,3517149.story
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-john-kerry-state-20121221,0,3517149.story
Originally posted by moon1969The Benghazi statement she made sealed her doom. Pity really.
The GOP wanted Kerry bad to be nominated, and were overflowing in their praise of his qualifications, and said Senate confirmation would be a cake walk. After all, they want to free up the Mass Senate seat for Scott Brown.
Should have been Rice.
Originally posted by sh76Has anyone though a minute about how idiotic it is for the United States to send woman after woman out as Secretary of State to negotiate with misogynistic male ambassadors of other nations. This includes the last three Presidents. The women could be highly qualified, and probably some of them were, but they worked with a decided disadvantage.
Bore them into submission, baby.
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-john-kerry-state-20121221,0,3517149.story
Originally posted by normbenignI saw people say that when Madeliene Albright was appointed Secretary of State. Your assumptions mean nothing. Dude, you really did expose yourself. You live in the past.
Has anyone though a minute about how idiotic it is for the United States to send woman after woman out as Secretary of State to negotiate with misogynistic male ambassadors of other nations. This includes the last three Presidents. The women could be highly qualified, and probably some of them were, but they worked with a decided disadvantage.
Originally posted by normbenignI think Kerry was the best we were going to get under Obama, but he's no prize. He has far too much affection for the UN and is too limp-wristed to be effective dealing with ChinaRussia. He's certainly not going to be the person that will referee a shoving match between India and Pakistan, and he'll do nothing to advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. He'll apologize for the United States the same way he sold out his Vietnam buddies on Capitol Hill.
Has anyone though a minute about how idiotic it is for the United States to send woman after woman out as Secretary of State to negotiate with misogynistic male ambassadors of other nations. This includes the last three Presidents. The women could be highly qualified, and probably some of them were, but they worked with a decided disadvantage.
Susan R ...[text shortened]... leaders that is given men in that position. Women begin way behind, trying to gain that respect.
Originally posted by normbenignSounds like more "projecting".
Has anyone though a minute about how idiotic it is for the United States to send woman after woman out as Secretary of State to negotiate with misogynistic male ambassadors of other nations. This includes the last three Presidents. The women could be highly qualified, and probably some of them were, but they worked with a decided disadvantage.
Susan R ...[text shortened]... leaders that is given men in that position. Women begin way behind, trying to gain that respect.
Originally posted by no1marauderYeah, he's really going downhill. Might have to take him out back and put him out of his misery?
Sounds like more "projecting".
Your attitudes are becoming more and more anachronistic.
Originally posted by sasquatch672What shall we do with sasquatch672?
Yeah, he's really going downhill. Might have to take him out back and put him out of his misery?
What is anachronistic about recognizing that in much of the world women do not garner the same respect as men? Those cultures are anachronistic. Recognizing for what they are and questioning the effectiveness of women as American diplomats based on that ...[text shortened]... alid question. Of course I'd prefer Hillary Clinton to Mr. Pink Lipstick Windsurfer any day.
Originally posted by moon1969Is it your notion that it doesn't matter what foreign leaders think of who does our negotiating?
I saw people say that when Madeliene Albright was appointed Secretary of State. Your assumptions mean nothing. Dude, you really did expose yourself. You live in the past.
I guess you thought it even worse for these countries with Thatcher as Britian PM or Benazir Bhutto as Pakistan PM or Corazon Aquino as Phillipines President. After all, what respe ...[text shortened]... and phone calls at the top level can be much important to sealing the deal than the ambassador.
Originally posted by sasquatch672Overall, I'm not questioning the qualifications of any of the women who served as Secretary of State. Only that they took the job with a disadvantage they couldn't readily overcome.
I think Kerry was the best we were going to get under Obama, but he's no prize. He has far too much affection for the UN and is too limp-wristed to be effective dealing with ChinaRussia. He's certainly not going to be the person that will referee a shoving match between India and Pakistan, and he'll do nothing to advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace ...[text shortened]... l of world leaders would regard a man with more respect. Golda Meir was one tough leader.
Originally posted by johnnylongwoodyVERY well done sir! Always loved you Irish...
What shall we do with sasquatch672?
He hates John Kerry and Obama too.
He hasn't much time either for poor Miss rice,
What she said about Benghazi was not too nice.
The speaker of the house spoke at will,
but then very few would support his bill.
Then just when you thought, we're on a roll,
up popped Lanza and now it's gun control.
Look o ...[text shortened]... wn.
I'll get my guitar and I'll play you a riff,
let's go jump off that fiscal cliff.
Originally posted by normbenignNo arguments. If Hillsry had advocated slinging nukes atAfghanistan, I'd say she would not get screwed with.
Overall, I'm not questioning the qualifications of any of the women who served as Secretary of State. Only that they took the job with a disadvantage they couldn't readily overcome.
Kind of like a 5' 100# woman thinking she can do the same job as a firefighter 6' and 200# male.
It could well be argued that the "right" woman could outperform any man ...[text shortened]... Benghazi.
It would be fun to see two losers fighting over the Democratic party spoils.