Originally posted by @deepthought Having read his Wikipedia page, I think I'd want verification from at least two trustworthy sources of anything he says.
Another Wikipedia believer. Do you think Fred Singer said Phobos is a hollow alien satellite too? Why the blind faith in unreliable info?
Originally posted by @kazetnagorra Probably the same people who were responsible for surveilling Trump using microwaves.
Dude, you believe in a left wing conspiracy theory that Russia helped Trump steal the election. You are a tinfoil hat wearing nut job projecting it onto others. You are pathetic!
McAfee is a presidential candidate that likes cryptocurrencies. He is a threat to the central banking cartel, the same cartel that had Saddam killed for selling oil in Euros instead of US dollars and having Gaddafi killed for promoting the gold dinar, another competing currency.
Originally posted by @metal-brain Dude, you believe in a left wing conspiracy theory that Russia helped Trump steal the election. You are a tinfoil hat wearing nut job projecting it onto others. You are pathetic!
Go ahead, hide your head in the sand and hope your dudes get elected by the Russians.
The fact they interfered with our election is not open for debate. They did and it has been proven to everyone's satisfaction except your lover Trump.
Funny you should be obliquely dissing your buddy Singer since you love to tout him as your mentor on the climate change conspiracy touted by Singer.
Originally posted by @metal-brain Another Wikipedia believer. Do you think Fred Singer said Phobos is a hollow alien satellite too? Why the blind faith in unreliable info?
I stated my source. The rest of my post was in the context of that source. Having read your other posts in this thread I think you need to stop using obvious Russian propaganda sites as your sources of information.
Incidentally, I do not want to sound anti-Russian, but their current government are a problem for Russians; never mind the rest of us.
Originally posted by @sonhouse Go ahead, hide your head in the sand and hope your dudes get elected by the Russians.
The fact they interfered with our election is not open for debate. They did and it has been proven to everyone's satisfaction except your lover Trump.
Funny you should be obliquely dissing your buddy Singer since you love to tout him as your mentor on the climate c ...[text shortened]... erican-unthinker.html
My guess is you have already read and dissed this article about Singer.
"The fact they interfered with our election is not open for debate"
Yes it is. There is no proof of that, just theory. You have yet to prove it. You seem to fearful to present any so called evidence since you have avoided doing that.
Originally posted by @deepthought I stated my source. The rest of my post was in the context of that source. Having read your other posts in this thread I think you need to stop using obvious Russian propaganda sites as your sources of information.
Incidentally, I do not want to sound anti-Russian, but their current government are a problem for Russians; never mind the rest of us.
What about your source? You have yet to make any point at all.
What the heck does Russia have to do with this thread? If the propaganda is obvious why do people believe it? What is obvious about it?
What is a problem with the government of Russians? You are not specific about anything. It is like you want to be a naysayer without saying anything substantial. Are you afraid I might prove you wrong? Is that why you constantly beat around the bush?
Originally posted by @metal-brain What about your source? You have yet to make any point at all.
What the heck does Russia have to do with this thread? If the propaganda is obvious why do people believe it? What is obvious about it?
What is a problem with the government of Russians? You are not specific about anything. It is like you want to be a naysayer without saying anything ...[text shortened]... antial. Are you afraid I might prove you wrong? Is that why you constantly beat around the bush?
Well, you seem to believe an awful lot of pseudoantiestablishment propaganda.
Originally posted by @deepthought Well, you seem to believe an awful lot of pseudoantiestablishment propaganda.
Well, you seem to believe an awful lot of pro-establishment propaganda.
What makes you think I have it wrong and not the other way around? I would be happy to debate that if you are willing. Do you think your country was justified in going to war against Iraq? Do you think your BBC News was spreading pro war propaganda or are you in denial of that?
23 Jun '18 13:47
John McAfee
Back to Top