08 Jun 07
Apparently miss piggy now claims that it was her belief in the Almighty that got her through the Lewinski affair and gave her the strength to not give up on her marriage to Bubba.
If the democrats become card carrying moral majorities as well, and the right no longer owns the religious voice of America what will that mean for 2008.
Theres a methodist in her madness it would seem.
08 Jun 07
Originally posted by kmax87I'm not sure the moral majority is going to be big on the idea of backing someone that accepts infidelity.
Apparently miss piggy now claims that it was her belief in the Almighty that got her through the Lewinski affair and gave her the strength to not give up on her marriage to Bubba.
If the democrats become card carrying moral majorities as well, and the right no longer owns the religious voice of America what will that mean for 2008.
Theres a methodist in her madness it would seem.
08 Jun 07
Originally posted by MerkI thought the ideas of grace and forgiveness were still strong rallying points of Christianity, or is confusing Christianity with religion and the moral majority the first basic flaw?
I'm not sure the moral majority is going to be big on the idea of backing someone that accepts infidelity.
08 Jun 07
Originally posted by kmax87Well, it's kind of a flaw, but there are so many individual interpretations of Christianity, its tough to make a call one way or the other.
I thought the ideas of grace and forgiveness were still strong rallying points of Christianity, or is confusing Christianity with religion and the moral majority the first basic flaw?
One thing for sure, is that many are going to view her poorly based on her accepting immoral behavior.
08 Jun 07
Originally posted by MerkThe fact that she thought the institution of marriage important enough to protect won't cut it?
Well, it's kind of a flaw, but there are so many individual interpretations of Christianity, its tough to make a call one way or the other.
One thing for sure, is that many are going to view her poorly based on her accepting immoral behavior.
08 Jun 07
Originally posted by kmax87She's got you fooled -- Hillary doesn't give a rat's tail about the institution of marriage since she's a lesbian and a socialist and lusts for power above all else. The only reason she clung to Slick Willie's coattails is because he would have been unelectable if he were divorced. The Clinton's marriage is merely a marriage of political convenience.
The fact that she thought the institution of marriage important enough to protect won't cut it?
08 Jun 07
Originally posted by kmax87Hardly. It takes a pretty bias interpretation to equate marriage with war.
Its the same contradictory mechanism. Its just on the one hand you find miss piggy on the nose yet you love beating up about the bush.
Regardless, in order for it to be anywhere near accurate, Hillary would have had to leave Bill.
Terrorists attack America and America attacks the terrorists back would be equal to Bill attacking Hillary and Hillary attacking Bill back.
Now if, Terrorist attack American and America talks it out with the terrorists, then we would have had something closer to what you're saying.
08 Jun 07
Originally posted by MerkIf everyone who was married dissolved that marriage because of infidelity then how could not accepting infidelity save marriage? Its actually the non acceptance of infidelity that has actually led to the high divorce rates we see around the world and because of the speed that people divorce these days the institute of marriage has taken quite a battering. The lack of wanting to save marriages, surely must lead to the decline of the institution itself.
Hardly. It takes a pretty bias interpretation to equate marriage with war.
Regardless, in order for it to be anywhere near accurate, Hillary would have had to leave Bill.
Terrorists attack America and America attacks the terrorists back would be equal to Bill attacking Hillary and Hillary attacking Bill back.
Now if, Terrorist attack American and Amer ...[text shortened]... alks it out with the terrorists, then we would have had something closer to what you're saying.
Having the ability to accept the mistakes of others and learning to be able to forgive the mistakes of others(including infidelity) is one sure way that the institute of marriage will once again flourish.
Hilary forgave and instead of being done with Bill she humbled herself not to take the moral high ground and start world war three. She still has a marriage.
Bush took an incident brought to American soil by a shadowy bunch of terrorists, but instead of dealing with the actual group itself decided to wage war against a nation, claiming that peace could only be won by war. Excuse me? Were the terrorists a homogeneous group before Bush's war on terror. Who articulated and constructed the notion of who that group was? Bush. Who decided where they were located? Bush. Who worked out that you could flush out an ill defined bunch of malcontents from within a closely knit civilian population and not create a bigger problem than ever existed before? Bush.
For Bush to have been on the same page as Hilary would have been to recognize that war will not create peace as she recognized that to save her marriage meant that she would have to be humble enough to forgive her husband.