@mott-the-hoople saidBut when states disastrously FAIL, the Feds have to step in.
no you dont have to “undo” anything…dem politicians see they can get you libs all tore up by claiming that…it works, but you dont have a foot to stand on.
This is what happens when libs dont do things correctly. Scotus members simply rule based on constitutional law, the constitution doesnt address abortion, same sex marriage or queerness in any form. The constitution does explicitly give the STATES the power to do this.
Natural Rights should not have to be codified.
And speaking of that, Nancy is right. It's well past time that we had a Federal law supporting a woman's right to make decisions concerning her own body, like men do. What happened to EQUAL treatment under the law? THAT is what is at stake here. Nothing less.
@mott-the-hoople saidIt most certainly does not. See the Ninth Amendment.
no you dont have to “undo” anything…dem politicians see they can get you libs all tore up by claiming that…it works, but you dont have a foot to stand on.
This is what happens when libs dont do things correctly. Scotus members simply rule based on constitutional law, the constitution doesnt address abortion, same sex marriage or queerness in any form. The constitution does explicitly give the STATES the power to do this.
@no1marauder saididiot...you are saying states do not have the power to legalize same sex marriage, abortion or queerness in any form?
It most certainly does not. See the Ninth Amendment.
@mott-the-hoople saidI'm saying there shouldn't be any need to since these rights are already protected no matter what a few SCOTUS judges say.
idiot...you are saying states do not have the power to legalize same sex marriage, abortion or queerness in any form?
@no1marauder saidLOL…not quite they way it works…your opinion of scotus rulings is worth absolutely nothing
I'm saying there shouldn't be any need to since these rights are already protected no matter what a few SCOTUS judges say.
@mott-the-hoople saidWe shall see.
LOL…not quite they way it works…your opinion of scotus rulings is worth absolutely nothing
A regime that refuses to recognize the People's Natural Rights is a tyranny and we know what the Framers thought about tyrannies.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. "
Declaration of Independence 1776
Governments are tools meant to protect the People's rights, not a weapon to bend them to the State's will.