Originally posted by PeachyPerhaps he misspoke, I don’t think we need to ascribe the notion that Western ideology = good and all others = bad. I do think any societal construct that relegates women to second-class citizenry by denying them a voice (read that: vote) in their own government is one that is trapped in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
western is good? 😛
Originally posted by Mangy Moooselol...l sounds like the argument we have going on in feminism. I just brought up this point today, women getting the vote in kuwait. I'm just wondering now how free of a vote it is. Anyway you look at it it's progress and hope for all of humankind.
Perhaps he misspoke, I don’t think we need to ascribe the notion that Western ideology = good and all others = bad. I do think any societal construct that relegates women to second-class citizenry by denying them a voice (read that: vote) in their own government is one that is trapped in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
Originally posted by no1marauderNo1 are you saying the US in not a 'real democracy'?
And the United States.
You say this as if we have not had a history of diversity in the White House for the past 20+ years.
5 terms for the Bushes and 2 for Clinton ... this is 'real democracy' ... yes?
And the possibility is out there for another Clinton ... if Hillary runs and wins ... but that is fodder for another thread.
Originally posted by Mangy Moooseaye.. i agree..
Perhaps he misspoke, I don’t think we need to ascribe the notion that Western ideology = good and all others = bad. I do think any societal construct that relegates women to second-class citizenry by denying them a voice (read that: vote) in their own government is one that is trapped in the past. Do you agree or disagree?