"The problem stems from a letter that Schiff sent to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) last week that summarizes “a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani,” Politico reported. “In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas ‘continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zelensky,’ citing a specific text message exchange where Parnas tells Giuliani: ‘trying to get us mr Z.’ The remainder of the exchange — which was attached to Schiff’s letter — was redacted.”
Politico added, “But an unredacted version of the exchange shows that several days later, Parnas sent Giuliani a word document that appears to show notes from an interview with Mykola Zlochevsky, the founder of Burisma, followed by a text message to Giuliani that states: ‘mr Z answers my brother.’ That suggests Parnas was referring to Zlochevsky not Zelensky.”
Democrat officials did not dispute the suggestion that Schiff’s claim was false."
https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-new-documents-show-democrat-adam-schiff-mischaracterized-evidence-in-impeachment-report-suggests
Keep in mind schiff read the unredacted version.
@Mott-The-Hoople
Is this from your handlers? Lev was into this up to his neck and the rePUTINicans just go, well how can you believe someone under indictment. Well the proof is in the pudding. The documentation of phone calls and written records showing Lev was being truthful in this even if he was doing other illegal stuff.
OF COURSE the Trump sycophants will dis the Parnas story since that would add weight to the fact that Trump is guilty as hell of extorting a foreign government for his own personal benefits having nothing to do with the office of presidency.
Of course that matters little to you, Putin, Moscow Mitch, William Barr, Linsey Granham cracker and of course Trump.
@sonhouse saidany time now!
@Mott-The-Hoople
Is this from your handlers? Lev was into this up to his neck and the rePUTINicans just go, well how can you believe someone under indictment. Well the proof is in the pudding. The documentation of phone calls and written records showing Lev was being truthful in this even if he was doing other illegal stuff.
OF COURSE the Trump sycophants will dis the Parn ...[text shortened]... atters little to you, Putin, Moscow Mitch, William Barr, Linsey Granham cracker and of course Trump.
@mott-the-hoople saidAnother selection from "Fairy Tales for Republicans" by Devin Nunes.
"The problem stems from a letter that Schiff sent to House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) last week that summarizes “a trove of evidence from Lev Parnas, an indicted former associate of Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani,” Politico reported. “In one section of the letter, Schiff claims that Parnas ‘continued to try to arrange a meeting with President Zele ...[text shortened]... cterized-evidence-in-impeachment-report-suggests
Keep in mind schiff read the unredacted version.
The reality: "Devin Nunes’ Ukraine lies are a betrayal. Voters in his district deserve better"
https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/editorials/article239465588.html
@suzianne saidI notice you didnt bother to defend schiff.
Another selection from "Fairy Tales for Republicans" by Devin Nunes.
The reality: "Devin Nunes’ Ukraine lies are a betrayal. Voters in his district deserve better"
https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/editorials/article239465588.html
You post an OPINION piece from a leftist rag. If your phone records were pulled, do you think you could remember every phone call?
@mott-the-hoople saidAny time now ?
any time now!
It's already happened !!
Impeachment is already in the history books !!
The fight now is for how much dirt makes it to the public domain for the upcoming election.
@Mott-The-Hoople
We don't have to defend absolute BULLSHYTE. Is that the best shot your handlers could come up with?
People notice bullshyte when they see it and come 2020 all your buddies will be in mourning of your beloved god and his sycophants. The cult will be broken and good riddance and hopefully see a bunch of them including Trump, in prison.
When he gets his sorry ass kicked out in November, there will be no protection of his tax returns and all the other frauds he engaged in.
You will see MORE of his temper tantrums then. If he doesn't just take his military in November and declare martial law and arrest all the house and senate and declare himself the king of the US.
@mghrn55 saidThis be true...
Any time now ?
It's already happened !!
Impeachment is already in the history books !!
The fight now is for how much dirt makes it to the public domain for the upcoming election.
And since the Repubs have the most control over the narrative, there will be witness testimony ONLY IF the Repubs think they win the battle of dirt.
@mghrn55 said"The fight now is for how much dirt makes it to the public domain for the upcoming election."
Any time now ?
It's already happened !!
Impeachment is already in the history books !!
The fight now is for how much dirt makes it to the public domain for the upcoming election.
EXACTLY...not about wrongdoing at all. schiff admitted as much. Dems are scared of the voters.
@mott-the-hoople saidNot bad, you only need about 16,000 more lies to tie with your president.
"The fight now is for how much dirt makes it to the public domain for the upcoming election."
EXACTLY...not about wrongdoing at all. schiff admitted as much. Dems are scared of the voters.
@earl-of-trumps saidYou’re missing the point.
This be true...
And since the Repubs have the most control over the narrative, there will be witness testimony ONLY IF the Repubs think they win the battle of dirt.
Trump will not be removed from office.
But these proceedings are all about how evidence the Dems can get out into the open. And how much the GOP can block.
And GOP will have control of the amount of evidence being presented.
If the evidence does come out, I suspect this will not be good for Trump.
You’re admitting as much by gloating over the fact that the GOP controls the narrative.
If you are confident that Trump is clean, then you have no problem with Bolton testifying. Correct ?
If the proceeding are in fact swept under the carpet, then the GOP will spend much of their campaign explaining to the electorate why.
Shouldn’t be a problem selling that to the Trump base. That support is locked up.
It’s the undecideds that will be looking for answers.
Mind you, if the Dems send Bernie Sanders up against Trump, it could be a different story.
I just don’t see America becoming that Socialist.
This will be a repeat of Jeremy Corbin - Boris Johnson debacle.
Which is why Trump went after Biden in the first place. And got himself into this pickle he is in now.
@mott-the-hoople saidJust one of 16,000?
I will give you a chance. Post one of those Trump lies please.
C'mon, you're not even trying to make this tough.
"And Mexico will pay for it (the wall)."
@suzianne saidhis term is not over yet. Besides, you know there are more than one way to pay for something. Bet you didnt think Mexico would be turning back invaders for the US either did you?
Just one of 16,000?
C'mon, you're not even trying to make this tough.
"And Mexico will pay for it (the wall)."