3 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidJust today, a reporter asked Mike Johnson, who is supposed to be promoting the SAVE act, if he can name one example of voter fraud that this bill would stop?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/americans-support-photo-id-vote-democrats-oppose-save-america-act-rcna259549
Why don’t you? Sue said we should. No one else. Sue. is on the side of conservatives.
What is wring w you people? 85%. Voter ID.
He was asked some version of the same question two more times, and yet he could not come up with anything. The bill will restrict voter access, not prevent fraud, which is why you don't come with facts, all you have is voter poll.
You're looking for proof of voter fraud? So is Mike Johnson. Apparently it doesn't matter if laws will stop crime anymore.
@wildgrass saidThis really smart poster for our leader!!!! He wants to cancel Forum Insurance because nothing has happened!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just today, a reporter asked Mike Johnson, who is supposed to be promoting the SAVE act, if he can name one example of voter fraud that this bill would stop?
He was asked some version of the same question two more times, and yet he could not come up with anything. The bill will restrict voter access, not prevent fraud, which is why you don't come with facts, all you have ...[text shortened]... of of voter fraud? So is Mike Johnson. Apparently it doesn't matter if laws will stop crime anymore.
He wants to cancel fire insurance because the house has not burned down yet, the Forum has not burned down yet!!!! Jesus.
Yeah, we want you in charge of common sense on the forum.
You are demanding that Johnson devise a system with safeguards which assure NOTHING can happen , a system that no nefarious person would be able to slip through. That, there is NO WAY that a person can come up with all of the ways to defraud the system. You are asking Johnson, himself, to come up with a way to defraud the system. Uhhh, now many ways are there, if he found a chair and sat down to dream them all up. Maybe 550,,,,,maybe 4000?
An impossible question do you not see.
Yeah, we want you in charge. Let Marauder help you. Two clowns.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou confuse and pose riddles around a simple issue.
This really smart poster for our leader!!!! He wants to cancel Forum Insurance because nothing has happened!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He wants to cancel fire insurance because the house has not burned down yet, the Forum has not burned down yet!!!! Jesus.
Yeah, we want you in charge of common sense on the forum.
You are demanding that Johnson devise a system with safeguards whi ...[text shortened]... ssible question do you not see.
Yeah, we want you in charge. Let Marauder help you. Two clowns.
A politician wants to pass a massive law increasing size and scope and surveillance state of government, possibly opening the door to government tracking of who each citizen voted for. It's problematic for a lot of other reasons too including disenfranchisement. The rationale is to prevent fraud. A reporter asks this politician a simple question, for an example of what fraud this law would prevent, and he has no answer.
@wildgrass saidI wouldn't have an answer either.....Why?, you ask??
You confuse and pose riddles around a simple issue.
A politician wants to pass a massive law increasing size and scope and surveillance state of government, possibly opening the door to government tracking of who each citizen voted for. It's problematic for a lot of other reasons too including disenfranchisement. The rationale is to prevent fraud. A reporter asks this po ...[text shortened]... tician a simple question, for an example of what fraud this law would prevent, and he has no answer.
Follow me, pisant, I don't have a mind, neither does the Speaker, that can concoct fraud. You lose. Speaker, he is the winner.
Do you consider yourself, a winner.....you, who are on the wrong side of all issues. You have never won one from me. I will aks you a question like you do Johnson....Tell me what issue between you and Avjoe where you came out on top. Quick. say it quickly, like you expected of Johnson.
Pitiful.
@AverageJoe1 saidWhy would a lawmaker be interested in passing a law to prevent something when that lawmaker doesn't have any evidence that preventing it would fix a problem?
I wouldn't have an answer either.....Why?, you ask??
Follow me, pisant, I don't have a mind, neither does the Speaker, that can concoct fraud. You lose. Speaker, he is the winner.
Do you consider yourself, a winner.....you, who are on the wrong side of all issues. You have never won one from me. I will aks you a question like you do Johnson....Tell me what issue ...[text shortened]... nd Avjoe where you came out on top. Quick. say it quickly, like you expected of Johnson.
Pitiful.
@wildgrass saidWhich issue? If you are saying in this new age, world of illegal entry, etc., none of which I have to explain to you, are you saying that that alone should not promulgate a change in our voting laws which makes us sure beyond doubt that only citizens vote? I refer you back to my analogy of someone coming in off the street and voting in a women’s bridge club. It is no different. Note that you never responded on that because I nailed you with that analogy.
Why would a lawmaker be interested in passing a law to prevent something when that lawmaker doesn't have any evidence that preventing it would fix a problem?
BTW are you aware of what your Democrats are doing to people that are trying to go through the airport on a weekend waiting in line ? I would almost pee in line on purpose to draw attention to the hell of it all.
Screw those passengers. Right?? Anyway, some of them are rich, fly first class, you don’t like them anyway. .
@AverageJoe1 saidWear a diaper like dump. He pees and shiits himself all the time. Filling the oval with the stink of death.
Which issue? If you are saying in this new age, world of illegal entry, etc., none of which I have to explain to you, are you saying that that alone should not promulgate a change in our voting laws which makes us sure beyond doubt that only citizens vote? I refer you back to my analogy of someone coming in off the street and voting in a women’s bridge club. It is no di ...[text shortened]... e passengers. Right?? Anyway, some of them are rich, fly first class, you don’t like them anyway. .
@AverageJoe1 saidHuh? This is your thread.
Which issue? If you are saying in this new age, world of illegal entry, etc., none of which I have to explain to you, are you saying that that alone should not promulgate a change in our voting laws which makes us sure beyond doubt that only citizens vote? I refer you back to my analogy of someone coming in off the street and voting in a women’s bridge club. It is no di ...[text shortened]... e passengers. Right?? Anyway, some of them are rich, fly first class, you don’t like them anyway. .
@wildgrass saidHey, are you sure you want to follow a post like that boy person?
Huh? This is your thread.
@wildgrass saidWild, see if this analogy works.
Just today, a reporter asked Mike Johnson, who is supposed to be promoting the SAVE act, if he can name one example of voter fraud that this bill would stop?
He was asked some version of the same question two more times, and yet he could not come up with anything. The bill will restrict voter access, not prevent fraud, which is why you don't come with facts, all you have ...[text shortened]... of of voter fraud? So is Mike Johnson. Apparently it doesn't matter if laws will stop crime anymore.
You think that if your home has not been broken into, don't bother locking the door. Crazy.
The 84% deserve action, not excuses.
@AverageJoe1 saidStop insulting me.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/americans-support-photo-id-vote-democrats-oppose-save-america-act-rcna259549
Why don’t you? Sue said we should. No one else. Sue. is on the side of conservatives.
What is wring w you people? 85%. Voter ID.
2 edits
@Earl-of-Trumps saidThe door is already locked. If you had appropriate security measures, then yes, don't worry about it.
Wild, see if this analogy works.
You think that if your home has not been broken into, don't bother locking the door. Crazy.
The 84% deserve action, not excuses.
Apparently The speaker of the house of representatives knows less than you.
Congratulations!!?
@Earl-of-Trumps saidLet's say you are trying to sell me on a new security system that would improve my existing system. I ask you how it will deter or prevent home invasions?
Wild, see if this analogy works.
You think that if your home has not been broken into, don't bother locking the door. Crazy.
The 84% deserve action, not excuses.
When Mike Johnson was asked this about his new election security bill he had no response. Literally could not describe a scenario.
@wildgrass saidI don't care what the system is, if the politicians control the funds, there is no protection.
Let's say you are trying to sell me on a new security system that would improve my existing system. I ask you how it will deter or prevent home invasions?
When Mike Johnson was asked this about his new election security bill he had no response. Literally could not describe a scenario.