Go back
Liking the Tea Party

Liking the Tea Party

Debates

spruce112358
It's All A Joke

Joined
23 Oct 04
Moves
4402
Clock
24 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

...for saying that cuts in defense spending are on the table.

http://www.theeagle.com/nation/Tea-party--Defense-cuts-on-table

"The widely held sentiment among Tea Party Patriot members is that every item in the budget, including military spending and foreign aid, must be on the table," said Mark Meckler, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. "The mentality that certain programs are 'off the table' must be taken off the table."

So let's see if, in the new climate of civility, this is an idea no1marauder and I can both stand firmly behind -- since we have both voiced support for such cuts in the past in these forums.

Agreed?

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
24 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

When's the last time Republicans reduced defense spending?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
24 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358
...for saying that cuts in defense spending are on the table.

http://www.theeagle.com/nation/Tea-party--Defense-cuts-on-table

"The widely held sentiment among Tea Party Patriot members is that every item in the budget, including military spending and foreign aid, must be on the table," said Mark Meckler, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. "The ...[text shortened]... - since we have both voiced support for such cuts in the past in these forums.

Agreed?
Let's see an actual proposal rather than a bunch of platitudes. Obviously there can be no significant cuts while the US is still occupying Iraq and Afghanistan.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
24 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358
...for saying that cuts in defense spending are on the table.

http://www.theeagle.com/nation/Tea-party--Defense-cuts-on-table

"The widely held sentiment among Tea Party Patriot members is that every item in the budget, including military spending and foreign aid, must be on the table," said Mark Meckler, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots. "The ...[text shortened]... - since we have both voiced support for such cuts in the past in these forums.

Agreed?
It's like I always said, just pick up an ax and begin swinging at government spending. It matters little what you hit so long as they keep the debt ceiling where it is.....which they won't.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
24 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
It's like I always said, just pick up an ax and begin swinging at government spending. It matters little what you hit so long as they keep the debt ceiling where it is.....which they won't.
Are you suggesting all government expenditures are equally efficient?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
24 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
It's like I always said, just pick up an ax and begin swinging at government spending. It matters little what you hit so long as they keep the debt ceiling where it is.....which they won't.
Please propose your one trillion dollars in spending cuts that will go into effect by April so that the debt ceiling doesn't have to be raised.

Thank you.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
24 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Please propose your one trillion dollars in spending cuts that will go into effect by April so that the debt ceiling doesn't have to be raised.

Thank you.
If I recall, you proposed one. Lets go with that plan. Really I could care less, just stop the madness!!

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
24 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Are you suggesting all government expenditures are equally efficient?
I'm suggesting that no matter your choice in cuts you will have people screaming that people will be dying in the streets because of spending cuts. It's a no win situation in that regard.

twhitehead

Cape Town

Joined
14 Apr 05
Moves
52945
Clock
25 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Obviously there can be no significant cuts while the US is still occupying Iraq and Afghanistan.
I am curious, what proportion of defense spending goes on Iraq and Afghanistan?
I thought that most US defense spending went on unnecessary things like too many nuclear weapons, fancy planes, research projects etc.
For most countries, defense spending has very little to do with actual needs and more to do with who is making money.

spruce112358
It's All A Joke

Joined
23 Oct 04
Moves
4402
Clock
25 Jan 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twhitehead
I am curious, what proportion of defense spending goes on Iraq and Afghanistan?
I thought that most US defense spending went on unnecessary things like too many nuclear weapons, fancy planes, research projects etc.
For most countries, defense spending has very little to do with actual needs and more to do with who is making money.
I think the cost of those wars amounts to something like 10-20% of the defense budget -- paid over and above the defense budget itself.

In 2009, the total military budget for the world was over $1.5 trillion of which the US spent 700 billion (including wars), or just under half.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.