@divegeester
Seriously - aren't there repercussions for breaking the law?
(Ignorance of the law is never an excuse for the common man.)
@wolfgang59 saidYou think decisions like this are made in a vacuum. There would have been a team of lawyers working on it. Might even be appealed yet, it's an example of how convoluted and mired 'law' has become.
@divegeester
Seriously - aren't there repercussions for breaking the law?
(Ignorance of the law is never an excuse for the common man.)
But hey, you're a state worshipper, we just need more of it.
@wolfgang59 saidthe Queen is just a little old lady with a crown
Boris found guilty of lying to the Queen!
Sentence?
Fine?
or "Off with his head"?
who cares?
2 edits
@soothfast saidFair point.
What "appeal" is there beyond the UK's supreme court?
But I think my original point stands, that this decision was not made lightly and a team of people would have looked at all scenarios, and especially the legality of the decision. At this level people don't do things and just hope no-one notices.
wolfgang reveals his naivety and his poor understanding with his OP.
1 edit
@wolfgang59 saidYes, I already conceded this to soothfast, message received, noted, aknowledged.
It's called a Supreme Court for a reason.
No appeals, no taking it to the House of Lords.
Now when are we going to hear a retraction from ewe about this so called 'lie' you accuse Johnson of in the OP.
@wolfgang59 saidAnd here I thought it was the law for the Parliament to carry out the will of the people by exiting Brexit.
@divegeester
Seriously - aren't there repercussions for breaking the law?
(Ignorance of the law is never an excuse for the common man.)
Pfft.