@wolfgang59 saidYou’re gonna need a bigger bait
Boris found guilty of lying to the Queen!
Sentence?
Fine?
or "Off with his head"?
@divegeester
Seriously - aren't there repercussions for breaking the law?
(Ignorance of the law is never an excuse for the common man.)
@wolfgang59 saidYou think decisions like this are made in a vacuum. There would have been a team of lawyers working on it. Might even be appealed yet, it's an example of how convoluted and mired 'law' has become.
@divegeester
Seriously - aren't there repercussions for breaking the law?
(Ignorance of the law is never an excuse for the common man.)
But hey, you're a state worshipper, we just need more of it.
@wolfgang59 saidWhat law did he break?
@divegeester
Seriously - aren't there repercussions for breaking the law?
(Ignorance of the law is never an excuse for the common man.)
He was advised by the attorney general that is was lawful, so what lie did he tell?
24 Sep 19
@wolfgang59 saidthe Queen is just a little old lady with a crown
Boris found guilty of lying to the Queen!
Sentence?
Fine?
or "Off with his head"?
who cares?
@soothfast saidIf John Brecow was a Leaver he would probably be able to find a precedent from Henry Vlll’s Court by the tea and biscuits break tomorrow.
What "appeal" is there beyond the UK's supreme court?
@soothfast saidFair point.
What "appeal" is there beyond the UK's supreme court?
But I think my original point stands, that this decision was not made lightly and a team of people would have looked at all scenarios, and especially the legality of the decision. At this level people don't do things and just hope no-one notices.
wolfgang reveals his naivety and his poor understanding with his OP.
@divegeester saidThe decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful
What law did he break?
Lady Hale
You will have to ask her for more details but I'll take her word for it.
@wolfgang59 saidYes, I already conceded this to soothfast, message received, noted, aknowledged.
It's called a Supreme Court for a reason.
No appeals, no taking it to the House of Lords.
Now when are we going to hear a retraction from ewe about this so called 'lie' you accuse Johnson of in the OP.
25 Sep 19
@wolfgang59 saidAnd here I thought it was the law for the Parliament to carry out the will of the people by exiting Brexit.
@divegeester
Seriously - aren't there repercussions for breaking the law?
(Ignorance of the law is never an excuse for the common man.)
Pfft.