5 edits
Originally posted by googlefudgeRed Herring Alert!!! Whether internet debating rules, or whether it sucks is irrelevant here. I know someone with a PhD who thinks your argument is wrong - in addition to the bracket on my last post it follows immediately that you are evil - since evil people are never right (again consider Hitler).
According to internet debating rules, your deploying of the Hitler argument invalidates your argument, and thus I must be right. 😏
Originally posted by googlefudgeNor does your post exist either then - yet clearly it does! Therefore you are even more evil than I first thought. This proves that I have committed no fallacies since good always triumphs over evil, and good = right =/= logical fallacies.
I don't believe the auto moderator allows the use of the word nazi on this site so your post can't exist, and thus neither does this one.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by AgergIf good always triumphs over evil, and I am evil, then I must have been defeated already, so I couldn't have posted.
Nor does your post exist either then - yet clearly it does! Therefore you are even more evil than I first thought. This proves that I have committed no fallacies since good always triumphs over evil, and good = right =/= logical fallacies.
I did post, thus I can't be evil, and thus you must be wrong.
Originally posted by googlefudgeYou spelt "pasted" wrong (you spelt it with an 'o' instead of an 'a'😉. How can you possibly have any credibility when you make typos?
If good always triumphs over evil, and I am evil, then I must have been defeated already, so I couldn't have posted.
I did post, thus I can't be evil, and thus you must be wrong.
