@AverageJoe1 saidIllegal aliens or asylum seekers escaping persecution?
They never answer questions.
Example, I have asked SHouse 10 times, does he think that the USA should pay for the healthcare of illegal aliens?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidAnyone here illegally that qualifies to be returned back to their homeland. Not hard to understand.
Illegal aliens or asylum seekers escaping persecution?
I don’t know why you throw asylum-seekers in there. I guess that’s for another thread, but might I point out to you that I know of no person here that is here claiming that they are being persecuted. You need to look that up. If someone says they are here because their husband beats the hell out of them three times a day, that is their problem. That is not
persecution. Send the lady back.
Send us a link on someone that is here because they are persecuted. There are none.
@AverageJoe1 saidThere are no asylum seekers in the US fleeing a country of persecution?
Anyone here illegally that qualifies to be returned back to their homeland. Not hard to understand.
I don’t know why you throw asylum-seekers in there. I guess that’s for another thread, but might I point out to you that I know of no person here that is here claiming that they are being persecuted. You need to look that up. If someone says they are here because their ...[text shortened]... e lady back.
Send us a link on someone that is here because they are persecuted. There are none.
Are you sure?
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidYou mentioned asylum seekers as if they actually exist. So I think the onus on you tell us their status and prospects…. and who they are
There are no asylum seekers in the US fleeing a country of persecution?
Are you sure?
@AverageJoe1 saidOh dear.
You mentioned asylum seekers as if they actually exist. So I think the onus on you tell us their status and prospects…. and who they are
This one has no sense.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidAsylum ‘seekers’, not same as people qualified for asylum. The slaughtered Christians in N Africa are qualified, let us give them a pass on seeking asylum and bring them the hell here, with certain conditions.
Oh dear.
This one has no sense.
So you are going to tell us what countries are persecuting people, which would qualify them to land here? Oh and this is important though you will gloss over it. The law is very clear that you MUST seek asylum from the closest country to the boundary of your country.
@AverageJoe1 saidNotice the man cannot answer. He is clueless about these matters. Over 100,000 people enter the UK every year seeking assylum, claiming persecution. Almost all are brassfaced liars, and the British authorities have no real way of checking the facts. What makes it worse for the gullible authorities is that what they are getting is the dregs of whatever society these boat people come in from. No decent educated qualified employed man sneaks into another country to beg for handouts.
Asylum ‘seekers’, not same as people qualified for asylum. The slaughtered Christians in N Africa are qualified, let us give them a pass on seeking asylum and bring them the hell here, with certain conditions.
So you are going to tell us what countries are persecuting people, which would qualify them to land here? Oh and this is important though you will gloss over ...[text shortened]... aw is very clear that you MUST seek asylum from the closest country to the boundary of your country.
So you are correct. Most assylum seekers do not qualify.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidNope, you are WRONG.
Your greatest ever post on the Forum. It has a beginning, a middle and an end. AND< it answers a question. I am giving you all the thumbs that I am allowed. It stands the test of comminicating. However, I must correct you.
Schumer and his fellow dems shut down the government with their MAIN effort which was to demand FREE HEALTHCARE for illegal aliens. You say th ...[text shortened]... are here illegally. Will you at least say yes or no to this question so that I can stop asking it.
Why are you wrong?
Because you only believe the pathological liar known as Donald Trump.
He claimed this same gaslighting was true and he is wrong, and therefore you are wrong.
The MAIN point of the Democrats was that if we don't keep the government shut down, then Trumpublicans have no reason to do the right thing and keep the ACA subsidies. 7 caved, and are we getting a vote on continuing ACA subsidies? Not just no, but HELL no.
You people are pathetic liars. You promised something you had no intention of doing, and 7 of us caved in to your lies. Way to keep f***ing the American people.
@Rajk999 saidSome have no choice.
Notice the man cannot answer. He is clueless about these matters. Over 100,000 people enter the UK every year seeking assylum, claiming persecution. Almost all are brassfaced liars, and the British authorities have no real way of checking the facts. What makes it worse for the gullible authorities is that what they are getting is the dregs of whatever society these boat pe ...[text shortened]... nto another country to beg for handouts.
So you are correct. Most assylum seekers do not qualify.
But you, safe in your ivory tower, don't see that.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou really need to get over this 'blaming the victim' thing you do.
You mentioned asylum seekers as if they actually exist. So I think the onus on you tell us their status and prospects…. and who they are
@Suzianne saidIs not our county inded the victim of scammers who do not qulaliy for asylum, and thus crowd our courts with bogus claims?
You really need to get over this 'blaming the victim' thing you do.
Read the elements required of asylum seekers.
Some are from Mexico
Show us ANY of those elements in Mexico.
If you cannot show (SHOW) us any, then do you think it would lighten the load of our courts to disallow any asylum seekers from Mexico?
And remember, as asylum laws go, Mexico and Canada are the ONLY countries where we are to accept seekers...the other 192 countires do not share a border with the USA.
C'mon, you wrote a great post last time.
@AverageJoe1 saidSNAP laws have changed,....i is discov ered that only 80% those who feed off of SNAP are qualified. So , the losers will now be required to work 80 hours A MONTH TO GET THE ....snaps? hell, i dokon't even know what it is.
Is not our county inded the victim of scammers who do not qulaliy for asylum, and thus crowd our courts with bogus claims?
Read the elements required of asylum seekers.
Some are from Mexico
Show us ANY of those elements in Mexico.
If you cannot show (SHOW) us any, then do you think it would lighten the load of our courts to disallow any asylum seekers from ...[text shortened]... other 192 countires do not share a border with the USA.
C'mon, you wrote a great post last time.
So they interviewed two of the losers on the street, one said they "literally' do not want to work and want free food These were not homeless people, they had the nose ring and one weighed like 299, Jabba the Hut. This one says 'it is not fair' (to not get free food).
I don't want to work to feed these losers. Tell me how I am a bad guy. I reject the notion that some people like yoy have to bust their buns to earn a living, and others live off of them.