Originally posted by FMFIn the US, near the end of a fiscal quarter you will see Police out setting up speedtraps- common practices are to setup around places with unusual change in speed limits (like dropping from 65mph to 45mph in rural Nevada etc.) to generate lacking revenue goals for the department.
Towards the end of the month here in Indonesia, police - in an income generating exercise - sometimes set up road blocks and fine people on the spot for relatively minor infractions. Sometimes they try to levy these fines even without the premise of any minor infractions. If you take out your mobile phone and appear to start videoing in these situations, the police officers either become really shirty or they just wave you on your way.
Originally posted by whodeyDid you know Big Brother and his minions were Anglos in the book?
Don't you guys get it? Big Brother wants to tape us 24/7 whether we are at work or driving in our cars or even at home taking a dump. However, they simply don't like being given the same treatment. After all, what would be next? Perhaps cameras for our legislatures 24/7? I know Obama promised them when they discussed Obamacare, but without secrecy and cabals their little conspiracies would all turn to poo.
Originally posted by sh76As you say its about consent. Downunder cops routinely advize you that they are recording you. Even in my mobile phone manual it advises that you seek permission of the person being recorded before doing so. I wonder how this affects the papparazzi enclave and how long the public's right to know can cloak deliberate attempts of catching the innocent in awkward poses.
This wasn't about filming cops per se, but a general MD law that prohibits taping someone without his or her consent. The law came up during the whole Monica Lewinsky- Linda Tripp mess...........This charge should be dismissed.
Originally posted by sh76such nice people, the washington state police forces.
What was interesting about that Seattle police video that generated a thousand post thread a few months back is that the police obviously knew they were being videotaped and kept saying things like "take as many pictures as you like but please step back and give up a little room, etc."
Originally posted by sh76you can't record or film someone without their consent in their homes. or let's say in their office or whatever.
This wasn't about filming cops per se, but a general MD law that prohibits taping someone without his or her consent. The law came up during the whole Monica Lewinsky- Linda Tripp mess.
I can't see how he's guilty of anything though, since there was obviously no intent. He didn't set out to tape anyone; he just put the camera in the helmet, presumably to cat ...[text shortened]... doesn't appear to have put it on just to tape the cop.
This charge should be dismissed.
in a public space however you should be able to do whatever. otherwise, i can't as a turist take pictures of the eiffel tower because some french doodz keep entering the frame.
Originally posted by Zahlanziyou can keep the shots if you're willing to photo-shop a vaseline filter over everyones head...
you can't record or film someone without their consent in their homes. or let's say in their office or whatever.
in a public space however you should be able to do whatever. otherwise, i can't as a turist take pictures of the eiffel tower because some french doodz keep entering the frame.
Originally posted by utherpendragonIs this youtube all we know about this? Do we know what happened before, and what happened when the camera was off? Do we knw what happened at where the camera was not turned? Do we know anything at all?
Man faces jail for recording cop
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNcDGqzAB30
Any comments on this?
Should anyone be able to film cops at any time?
Making it a felony to do so ,a good thing or absurd?
Or is this just sensationalism? Where is the hidden agenda?
Originally posted by FabianFnasDont get caught up with sensationalism or anything else. the moment caught on video is everything. Provocation is no excuse for unproffesional behaviour...
Is this youtube all we know about this? Do we know what happened before, and what happened when the camera was off? Do we knw what happened at where the camera was not turned? Do we know anything at all?
Or is this just sensationalism? Where is the hidden agenda?