Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Mr. Wolf
    at home
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    45641
    14 Mar '19 21:51
    Well ... not quite.
    He wasn't found guilty because he was not charged.
    Still some nice jail time though unless Trump bails him out.

    Seems Trump's catch-phrase is now NO COLLUSION
    (BUILD THAT WALL is so passé.)
  2. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    81346
    14 Mar '19 23:00
    @wolfgang59 said
    Well ... not quite.
    He wasn't found guilty because he was not charged.
    Still some nice jail time though unless Trump bails him out.

    Seems Trump's catch-phrase is now NO COLLUSION
    (BUILD THAT WALL is so passé.)
    do you think it is fair to imprison Manafort and let Podesta off the hook?
  3. Joined
    27 Jul '10
    Moves
    29432
    15 Mar '19 01:19
    @wolfgang59 said
    Well ... not quite.
    He wasn't found guilty because he was not charged.
    Still some nice jail time though unless Trump bails him out.

    Seems Trump's catch-phrase is now NO COLLUSION
    (BUILD THAT WALL is so passé.)
    Cmon Wolfieyou are losing traction. After all the stuff about a trump collusion, about which the conserves here have time again said you were going to be disappointed........well, now you are disappointed, and you roar back with “Trump’s catch phrase is NOW! NOW!!! .".NO COLLUSION. Now? He,s been saying since early 2016.
  4. Joined
    27 Jul '10
    Moves
    29432
    15 Mar '19 01:23
    @mott-the-hoople said
    do you think it is fair to imprison Manafort and let Podesta off the hook?
    Different crimes, so we would have to bring him to court to see if and what he committed. Libs tend to convict early on , usually before a charge us even brought, but since he is one of them, they are laying low.
  5. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Mr. Wolf
    at home
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    45641
    15 Mar '19 02:00
    @AverageJoe1
    Jesus H. Christ
    Your comprehension is really that poor isn't it!
  6. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    7306
    15 Mar '19 08:53
    @mott-the-hoople said
    do you think it is fair to imprison Manafort and let Podesta off the hook?
    But... what about Benghazi!!??!?
  7. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    81346
    15 Mar '19 10:42
    @averagejoe1 said
    Different crimes, so we would have to bring him to court to see if and what he committed. Libs tend to convict early on , usually before a charge us even brought, but since he is one of them, they are laying low.
    same crime...
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/robert-mueller-offers-tony-podesta-immunity-to-testify-against-paul-manafort-report
  8. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    81346
    15 Mar '19 10:43
    @shallow-blue said
    But... what about Benghazi!!??!?
    yeah, just useless lives lost right?
  9. SubscriberPonderableonline
    chemist
    Linkenheim
    Joined
    22 Apr '05
    Moves
    527927
    15 Mar '19 10:49
    @mott-the-hoople said
    yeah, just useless lives lost right?
    No.

    Whataboutism...

    To make a few things clear: Paul Manafort was indicted, tried and convicted for tax fraud.
    He was never indicted nor tried nor convicted for "Collusion".
    The lawyer of Manafort tried to make a victim out of Manafort hinting that he was indeed tried and convited for an unproven indictment of Collusion.

    To bring in Podesta is trying to diffuse the point made by the OP, that the collusion topic was a smoke grenade in relation to the Manafort conviction.

    To bring in Benghazi at every point is just such a smoke grenade. If you can make out any criminal offense you should go to the relevant GA's office and bring in your knowledge which will b chekced and if there is any substance indictements and trials will follow.
  10. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Mr. Wolf
    at home
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    45641
    15 Mar '19 10:55
    @ponderable said
    To make a few things clear: Paul Manafort was indicted, tried and convicted for tax fraud.
    He was never indicted nor tried nor convicted for "Collusion".
    Precisely.

    Can you imagine the barrister of a common thief saying
    "My client is entirely innocent of murder"
    WTF

    Manafort's trial was not about collusion,
    the judge re-iterated that
    and Trump twists the truth to say something like
    "The judge exonerated him from any collusion".
    NO
    That is not what the judge said!
Back to Top