12 May 18
Trump threatens corporations with regulation and or scrutiny and then sends Michael Cohen around to collect protection money. While we may think of The Donald, or The Don as simply a name with humourous connotations, maybe the real joke is the extent to which selling protection is the modus operandi of The Donald's, Trump Organisation.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
Originally posted by @kmax87LOL...oh my the looniness of a lefty. Only problem with your theory is Trump is the king of deregulation. You may want to look at why Obama had all those regulations in place, you may be on to something.
Trump threatens corporations with regulation and or scrutiny and then sends Michael Cohen around to collect protection money. While we may think of The Donald, or The Don as simply a name with humourous connotations, maybe the real joke is the extent to which selling protection is the modus operandi of The Donald's, Trump Organisation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/01/us/politics/trump-businesses-regulation-economic-growth.html
13 May 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleWhy did those corporations pay millions of dollars to the same shell corporation that Cohen created to conceal the payoff to Stormy Daniels?
LOL...oh my the looniness of a lefty. Only problem with your theory is Trump is the king of deregulation. You may want to look at why Obama had all those regulations in place, you may be on to something.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/01/us/politics/trump-businesses-regulation-economic-growth.html
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
13 May 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderpaid " millions" to pay off 130 thousand? LOL
Why did those corporations pay millions of dollars to the same shell corporation that Cohen created to conceal the payoff to Stormy Daniels?
13 May 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hooplehttps://www.thestreet.com/politics/novartis-ties-to-michael-cohen-exposed-14584906
paid " millions" to pay off 130 thousand? LOL
I guess the nut conspiracy sites you rely on missed this.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
13 May 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderand you offer up thestreet.com...lol@the site snitch!
https://www.thestreet.com/politics/novartis-ties-to-michael-cohen-exposed-14584906
I guess the nut conspiracy sites you rely on missed this.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleAre you seriously denying the facts contained in that story?
and you offer up thestreet.com...lol@the site snitch!
Novartis paid Cohen $1.2 million in 2017 even though he essentially did nothing though he had promised "access to Trump and influential officials in the new administration". They declined to terminate the contract because:
Rather than attempt to cancel the contract, the company allowed it to lapse early in 2018 and not run the risk of ticking off the president. “It might have caused anger,” this person said.
https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2018/05/09/trumps-lawyer-cohen-fixer-novartis/
13 May 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderAre you seriously denying the facts contained in that story?
Are you seriously denying the facts contained in that story?
Novartis paid Cohen $1.2 million in 2017 even though he essentially did nothing though he had promised "access to Trump and influential officials in the new administration". They declined to terminate the contract because:
Rather than attempt to cancel the contract, the company allowed i ...[text shortened]... erson said.
https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2018/05/09/trumps-lawyer-cohen-fixer-novartis/
They didn't cover that in the Daily Dot or the National Enquirer. 🙂
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
13 May 18
Originally posted by @no1maraudernow show me how Trump is complicit?
Are you seriously denying the facts contained in that story?
Novartis paid Cohen $1.2 million in 2017 even though he essentially did nothing though he had promised "access to Trump and influential officials in the new administration". They declined to terminate the contract because:
Rather than attempt to cancel the contract, the company allowed i ...[text shortened]... erson said.
https://www.statnews.com/pharmalot/2018/05/09/trumps-lawyer-cohen-fixer-novartis/
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople"You'll have to ask Michael Cohen," Trump said. "Michael is my attorney. You'll have to ask Michael."
now show me how Trump is complicit?
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/05/politics/donald-trump-stormy-daniels/index.html
Oh, they'll be asking. There's a reason Trump went nuts (well more nuts than usual) when the Feds seized Cohen's records.
Trump: But, Michael would represent me and represent me on some things. He represents me — like with this crazy Stormy Daniels deal he represented me.
http://time.com/5264555/donald-trump-statements-stormy-daniels-payoff/
The SD payoff was out of the same shell company that received millions from Novartis, A T & T, Korean Aerospace, Columbus Nova,( a Manhattan-based investment firm with close ties to sanctioned Russian billionaire Viktor Vekselberg), etc. etc. etc.
"In a striking coincidence, Trump had dinner with Novartis' soon-to-be CEO Vasant Narasimhan, along with other European executives, at the World Economic Forum in Davos shortly after the date of the final payment to Cohen."
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/companies-admit-funneling-money-michael-cohen-owned-firm-article-1.3980179
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
14 May 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderso you cant? LOL@thesnitch
"You'll have to ask Michael Cohen," Trump said. "Michael is my attorney. You'll have to ask Michael."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/05/politics/donald-trump-stormy-daniels/index.html
Oh, they'll be asking. There's a reason Trump went nuts (well more nuts than usual) when the Feds seized Cohen's records.
Trump: But, Michael would represent me and ...[text shortened]... ews.com/news/politics/companies-admit-funneling-money-michael-cohen-owned-firm-article-1.3980179
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleI don't have to at this time. This case is not going to be resolved in the media, but based on the evidence brought forward. Cohen's records are in the hands of prosecutors and we'll have to see what eventually comes out. Trump has already publicly lied about matters relating to Cohen and may be complicit in Cohen's illegal campaign contribution; what else he is lying about I guess we'll see.
so you cant? LOL@thesnitch
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147482
14 May 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderLOL@thesnitch! "I don't have to" LMFAO
I don't have to at this time. This case is not going to be resolved in the media, but based on the evidence brought forward. Cohen's records are in the hands of prosecutors and we'll have to see what eventually comes out. Trump has already publicly lied about matters relating to Cohen and may be complicit in Cohen's illegal campaign contribution; what else he is lying about I guess we'll see.
14 May 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleKeep laughing, Mott.
LOL@thesnitch! "I don't have to" LMFAO
I doubt you'll have any reason for amusement when the indictments start rolling in.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleSeems like a deal compared to what Bill Clinton paid his whores and what Congressmen over the years paid off those women they sexually assaulted.
paid " millions" to pay off 130 thousand? LOL
Now all of a sudden the Left is concerned about morality?
LMAO!
They are true idiots.