https://www.infowars.com/vaticans-3rd-most-powerful-figure-cardinal-pell-charged-with-sex-assaults-on-minors/
One of the top guys under the current Pope has been accused of sexual abuse of boys. He escapes prosecution because he now lives in the Vatican and the current Pope seems to be protecting him.
Originally posted by whodeyHere is an actual news story about the case:
I dunno, do half wits enjoy ignoring pedophile behavior?
Are you suggesting this is fake news?
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-40552199
Now how can Pell face a court on July 26 when he, according to your synopsis of the InfoWars "article," is "escaping prosecution"?
Tip: if you lack a pathological desire to come across as the dumbest person in the history of the Universe, regard people who visit InfoWars to get their news as the dumbest people in the Universe.
1 edit
Originally posted by finneganHe sits at the Vatican with the current Pope.
Are you suggesting it is news?
Are you suggesting it is being ignored?
What is being done about it?
Why not return him to the country that is brining charges against him?
Why hide behind the skirt of the Pope?
And why on earth would you defend him?
Originally posted by KazetNagorraWell if that is true, then good.
Here is an actual news story about the case:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-40552199
Now how can Pell face a court on July 26 when he, according to your synopsis of the InfoWars "article," is "escaping prosecution"?
Tip: if you lack a pathological desire to come across as the dumbest person in the history of the Universe, regard people who visit InfoWars to get their news as the dumbest people in the Universe.
How likely do you think it will be that he is found guilty with the wealth of the Vatican behind him?
1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyDo you really think Australian courts give a damn about how much wealth the Vatican has?
Well if that is true, then good.
How likely do you think it will be that he is found guilty with the wealth of the Vatican behind him?
Are you going to acknowledge and apologize for - again - spreading lies on this forum?
Originally posted by whodeyOn your questions:
He sits at the Vatican with the current Pope.
What is being done about it?
Why not return him to the country that is brining charges against him?
Why hide behind the skirt of the Pope?
And why on earth would you defend him?
He laid down his Mission more than two weeks ago.
he did return to Australia, arriving Monday (four days befiore your attack!)
last asner is sufficient.
If you would be before any court for anything you probably would Claim your "innocent until proven guilty", so why not him?
Your attack si absolutely baseless and your recherche was nonexistent.
You just seem to like to smear. Shame on you!
Originally posted by KazetNagorraWealth has no influence on how court cases come out?
Do you really think Australian courts give a damn about how much wealth the Vatican has?
Are you going to acknowledge and apologize for - again - spreading lies on this forum?
Really? Is this what you expect me to believe?