RT (Russia Today) News is supposedly how Russia tried to interfere with USA elections. This is what Americans do every day because we have freedom of speech, but our government has a problem with freedom of speech when it comes from Russia. Now they imply Mueller is doing it to drag out the investigation to make himself rich.
How about some good questions that the corporate news media is ignoring like the plague.
How did Mueller find out who the 13 Russians were?
If he really did find the culprits, does that mean the Russian government was not involved? Surely the Russian government could cover it's cyber tracks better than that, right?
Didn't Wikileaks leak documents showing that the CIA had perfected techniques to use foreign source code to make it look like another country was involved in a cyber attack that was actually a CIA attack?
Seems to me that anything that was state sponsored would have been impossible to crack. Mueller naming specific people should rule out the Russian government.
Originally posted by @metal-brain RT (Russia Today) News is supposedly how Russia tried to interfere with USA elections. This is what Americans do every day because we have freedom of speech, but our government has a problem with freedom of speech when it comes from Russia. Now they imply Mueller is doing it to drag out the investigation to make himself rich.
https://www.rt.com/usa/4 ...[text shortened]... been impossible to crack. Mueller naming specific people should rule out the Russian government.
Ummm, Wikileaks produced a lot of documents that came from Russian sources, so it's not like they actually have any credibility anymore.
And, yeah right, your source is Russia Today. What do you think their position is going to be?
Originally posted by @suzianne Ummm, Wikileaks produced a lot of documents that came from Russian sources, so it's not like they actually have any credibility anymore.
And, yeah right, your source is Russia Today. What do you think their position is going to be?
WikiLeaks produced documents that came from DNC sources. Documents that showed how corrupt Clinton was.
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople Well go ahead...show me what Trump has done. The OIG report is due out anytime...you are going to hear plenty about Obama and Hillary and crew.
So Trumpf making the US the laughing stock of the world isn't enough? How many members of his cabinet have been fired now? Saying he is going to make Jerusalem the home of the US Embassy means nothing to you? Not releasing his tax forms means nothing? In my eyes it makes him look guilty of something TBD.
You figure he just gets away with sexual abuse, screwing a porn star the day his son is born? Just exactly how far down does this tramp I mean trump have to go to draw the line for you?
He is a narcissistic sociopath with short attention span who NEVER reads and claims he has a genius IQ? None of that means shyte with you?
Did you notice he had a cheat sheet at that meeting of the Florida survivers which he held away from him where he couldn't even read it, one sentence saying 'I hear you' like he would have to memorize that phrase?
How far down the gutter does this assswipe have to go to get your attention?
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople Well go ahead...show me what Trump has done. The OIG report is due out anytime...you are going to hear plenty about Obama and Hillary and crew.
Dream on. Everyone who watched the debates in 2016 heard Trump invite the Russians to "hack" Hillary's email. Only gullible people like you believe they passed them right through without edit.
When will you conservatards finally realize you've been lied to for votes? You keep on holding on to your dream of Hillary being guilty so that you don't have to admit that all the guilt lies with your president and those who acted on his behalf.
Originally posted by @suzianne Ummm, Wikileaks produced a lot of documents that came from Russian sources, so it's not like they actually have any credibility anymore.
And, yeah right, your source is Russia Today. What do you think their position is going to be?
There is evidence Wikileaks got their information from Russia? I don't think Jullian Assange ever admitted that to anyone. Last I knew he doesn't reveal any of his sources. What is your source of info, Paul Ryan? LOL! Paul Ryan was asserting his opinion and nothing more. No evidence!
Yes, Russia today has an opinion just like Paul Ryan and other corrupt minions with no evidence. Should we only hear one side of the story?
Originally posted by @metal-brain There is evidence Wikileaks got their information from Russia? I don't think Jullian Assange ever admitted that to anyone. Last I knew he doesn't reveal any of his sources. What is your source of info, Paul Ryan? LOL! Paul Ryan was asserting his opinion and nothing more. No evidence!
Yes, Russia today has an opinion just like Paul Ryan and other corrupt minions with no evidence. Should we only hear one side of the story?
Well, like most people except spoon-fed Fox News babies, we could do without all the blatant lies.