Go back
'no state funding'

'no state funding'

Debates

A Unique Nickname

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
19036
Clock
29 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

was the excuse a member of the green party in england said was the reason why they weren't as popular (or hadn't picked up as many parliament seats) as they thought they should have by now.

should a state really be part funding it's opposition?
do they in other countries?

Kewpie
Felis Australis

Australia

Joined
20 Jan 09
Moves
390162
Clock
29 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
was the excuse a member of the green party in england said was the reason why they weren't as popular (or hadn't picked up as many parliament seats) as they thought they should have by now.

should a state really be part funding it's opposition?
do they in other countries?
In Australia the govt (taxpayers) offer funding to all political parties based on the number of primary votes they got at the last election. The Greens have done very well here under that system.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
29 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

The reason the Green Party in the UK has not done very well is because the UK has a two-party system. This is so obvious that it's bizarre the Green Party itself doesn't realize this.

g

Pepperland

Joined
30 May 07
Moves
12892
Clock
29 Nov 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
was the excuse a member of the green party in england said was the reason why they weren't as popular (or hadn't picked up as many parliament seats) as they thought they should have by now.

should a state really be part funding it's opposition?
do they in other countries?
of course they should, after all, the government has an unlimited source of money!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.