Originally posted by @romans1009 I think the rationale is because drugs and bad hombres can come through the southern border, use of military funds is justified.
And Mexico may very well end up paying for the wall through tariffs or other punitive measures.
Hard to see how Trump keeps losing. The economy’s doing well and ISIS is not.
One of the strength that Trump was seen to exhibit was "clearness".
If I say "pay" that means I receive something and I give the Money.
How exactly would the calculation run about the tariff? Is there any clear Connection which enables anybody to follow the Money#s path?
Removed
Account suspended
Joined
31 Jan '18
Moves
3456
28 Mar '18 12:27
Originally posted by @ponderable One of the strength that Trump was seen to exhibit was "clearness".
If I say "pay" that means I receive something and I give the Money.
How exactly would the calculation run about the tariff? Is there any clear Connection which enables anybody to follow the Money#s path?
I’m sure the media, especially the financial media, can track the effects of any tariffs or other punitive measures designed to force reimbursement for the cost of the wall.
Originally posted by @ponderable One of the strength that Trump was seen to exhibit was "clearness".
If I say "pay" that means I receive something and I give the Money.
How exactly would the calculation run about the tariff? Is there any clear Connection which enables anybody to follow the Money#s path?
No wall for Trump
28 Mar '18 12:24
Back to Top