@mott-the-hoople saidRight wingers react to NK ICBM: https://changingworld.com/pub/media/catalog/product/cache/066c2a979193e2b3a2b6e952bb825a92/8/c/8cp-10211_1.jpg
“ "North Korea unveiled what appears to be a new intercontinental ballistic missile
Well, 2 out of three ain't bad.
@Mott-The-Hoople....Yeah, they finished developing,
and had their first test when G.W. was looking for
imaginary WMD in IRAQ...
......Talk of taking your eye off the ball !!
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-reason-north-korea-developed-nuclear-weapons-survival-18095
@no1marauder saidyou post about something that isnt proven and run with it as if it is established fact. as soon as you have some proof come back.
Right wingers react to NK ICBM: https://changingworld.com/pub/media/catalog/product/cache/066c2a979193e2b3a2b6e952bb825a92/8/c/8cp-10211_1.jpg
Well, 2 out of three ain't bad.
Anyway, did Trump contribute 1.8 billion to their nuclear endeavors? the word hypocrite comes to mind.
@jimm619 saidlink? or are you just incoherently blabbering?
@Mott-The-Hoople....Yeah, they finished developing,
and had their first test when G.W. was looking for
imaginary WMD in IRAQ...
......Talk of taking your eye off the ball !!
@mott-the-hoople saidLMAO! "Isn't proven"? There's a nice big picture of the ICBM in the link I provided hence my second link.
you post about something that isnt proven and run with it as if it is established fact. as soon as you have some proof come back.
Anyway, did Trump contribute 1.8 billion to their nuclear endeavors? the word hypocrite comes to mind.
Don't really know what you are talking about with the $1.8 billion crap except an obvious attempt to change the subject since what you originally wanted to talk about hasn't worked out toooooooooooooooooo well.
This missile was the next logical step in NOKO's missile development and US Intel knew it.
Before, when they tested their latest ballistic missile, it proved to be capable of reaching NYC, although, not Washington.
This missile, I feel certain, is real. The truck carrying had 22 axles. yikes. But we will know for sure as they intend to test it.
It is MIRV capable ( multiple warheads) and can hit anywhere in the US.
@Mott-The-Hoople...I f you think ANY PRESIDENT, wants
gasoline prices to go up during their watch you are
either stupid or naive. I'll give you the benefit of doubt----
YOU ARE VERY NAIVE.
@no1marauder saidyou seem to dislike adversaries having nukes but didnt say anything when obama gave iran the money to develop them, clinton sold russia the material to make them. and you get upset with what APPEARS to be.
LMAO! "Isn't proven"? There's a nice big picture of the ICBM in the link I provided hence my second link.
Don't really know what you are talking about with the $1.8 billion crap except an obvious attempt to change the subject since what you originally wanted to talk about hasn't worked out toooooooooooooooooo well.
@jimm619 saidit is stupid to not acknowledge what you personally witnessed.
@Mott-The-Hoople...I f you think ANY PRESIDENT, wants
gasoline prices to go up during their watch you are
either stupid or naive. I'll give you the benefit of doubt----
YOU ARE VERY NAIVE.
@mott-the-hoople saidObama never did any such thing and a framework was in place to prevent Iran from ever obtaining nuclear weapons which the Donald destroyed.
you seem to dislike adversaries having nukes but didnt say anything when obama gave iran the money to develop them, clinton sold russia the material to make them. and you get upset with what APPEARS to be.
The post that was quoted here has been removed"In August 2016, during the annual joint US-South Korea military exercise, a submarine presumed to be this one launched what is believed to be a KN-11 ballistic missile into the Sea of Japan.[9] North Korea's first released pictures of the submarine associated it with the test of the KN-11 missile.[3]"
How is this statement consistent with the prior "But there is no known evidence that the navy has operational submarines capable of firing ballistic missiles carrying nuclear warheads."?
@no1marauder saidyes obama did, not any argument there.
Obama never did any such thing and a framework was in place to prevent Iran from ever obtaining nuclear weapons which the Donald destroyed.
@no1marauder said“appears” and “believed to be” is not evidence, it is speculation.
"In August 2016, during the annual joint US-South Korea military exercise, a submarine presumed to be this one launched what is believed to be a KN-11 ballistic missile into the Sea of Japan.[9] North Korea's first released pictures of the submarine associated it with the test of the KN-11 missile.[3]"
How is this statement consistent with the prior "But there is no kn ...[text shortened]... he navy has operational submarines capable of firing ballistic missiles carrying nuclear warheads."?