Go back
NOKO firing missiles...

NOKO firing missiles...

Debates


@mott-the-hoople said
“ "North Korea unveiled what appears to be a new intercontinental ballistic missile
Right wingers react to NK ICBM: https://changingworld.com/pub/media/catalog/product/cache/066c2a979193e2b3a2b6e952bb825a92/8/c/8cp-10211_1.jpg

Well, 2 out of three ain't bad.

1 edit

@Mott-The-Hoople....Yeah, they finished developing,
and had their first test when G.W. was looking for
imaginary WMD in IRAQ...
......Talk of taking your eye off the ball !!
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-reason-north-korea-developed-nuclear-weapons-survival-18095


@no1marauder said
Right wingers react to NK ICBM: https://changingworld.com/pub/media/catalog/product/cache/066c2a979193e2b3a2b6e952bb825a92/8/c/8cp-10211_1.jpg

Well, 2 out of three ain't bad.
you post about something that isnt proven and run with it as if it is established fact. as soon as you have some proof come back.

Anyway, did Trump contribute 1.8 billion to their nuclear endeavors? the word hypocrite comes to mind.


@jimm619 said
@Mott-The-Hoople....Yeah, they finished developing,
and had their first test when G.W. was looking for
imaginary WMD in IRAQ...
......Talk of taking your eye off the ball !!
link? or are you just incoherently blabbering?


@mott-the-hoople said
you post about something that isnt proven and run with it as if it is established fact. as soon as you have some proof come back.

Anyway, did Trump contribute 1.8 billion to their nuclear endeavors? the word hypocrite comes to mind.
LMAO! "Isn't proven"? There's a nice big picture of the ICBM in the link I provided hence my second link.

Don't really know what you are talking about with the $1.8 billion crap except an obvious attempt to change the subject since what you originally wanted to talk about hasn't worked out toooooooooooooooooo well.

1 edit

This missile was the next logical step in NOKO's missile development and US Intel knew it.

Before, when they tested their latest ballistic missile, it proved to be capable of reaching NYC, although, not Washington.
This missile, I feel certain, is real. The truck carrying had 22 axles. yikes. But we will know for sure as they intend to test it.

It is MIRV capable ( multiple warheads) and can hit anywhere in the US.

5 edits


@Mott-The-Hoople...I f you think ANY PRESIDENT, wants
gasoline prices to go up during their watch you are
either stupid or naive. I'll give you the benefit of doubt----
YOU ARE VERY NAIVE.

1 edit

@no1marauder said
LMAO! "Isn't proven"? There's a nice big picture of the ICBM in the link I provided hence my second link.

Don't really know what you are talking about with the $1.8 billion crap except an obvious attempt to change the subject since what you originally wanted to talk about hasn't worked out toooooooooooooooooo well.
you seem to dislike adversaries having nukes but didnt say anything when obama gave iran the money to develop them, clinton sold russia the material to make them. and you get upset with what APPEARS to be.


@jimm619 said
@Mott-The-Hoople...I f you think ANY PRESIDENT, wants
gasoline prices to go up during their watch you are
either stupid or naive. I'll give you the benefit of doubt----
YOU ARE VERY NAIVE.
it is stupid to not acknowledge what you personally witnessed.


@mott-the-hoople said
you seem to dislike adversaries having nukes but didnt say anything when obama gave iran the money to develop them, clinton sold russia the material to make them. and you get upset with what APPEARS to be.
Obama never did any such thing and a framework was in place to prevent Iran from ever obtaining nuclear weapons which the Donald destroyed.


The post that was quoted here has been removed
"In August 2016, during the annual joint US-South Korea military exercise, a submarine presumed to be this one launched what is believed to be a KN-11 ballistic missile into the Sea of Japan.[9] North Korea's first released pictures of the submarine associated it with the test of the KN-11 missile.[3]"

How is this statement consistent with the prior "But there is no known evidence that the navy has operational submarines capable of firing ballistic missiles carrying nuclear warheads."?


@no1marauder said
Obama never did any such thing and a framework was in place to prevent Iran from ever obtaining nuclear weapons which the Donald destroyed.
yes obama did, not any argument there.


@no1marauder said
"In August 2016, during the annual joint US-South Korea military exercise, a submarine presumed to be this one launched what is believed to be a KN-11 ballistic missile into the Sea of Japan.[9] North Korea's first released pictures of the submarine associated it with the test of the KN-11 missile.[3]"

How is this statement consistent with the prior "But there is no kn ...[text shortened]... he navy has operational submarines capable of firing ballistic missiles carrying nuclear warheads."?
“appears” and “believed to be” is not evidence, it is speculation.

4 edits