Go back
North Korea goes BANG!

North Korea goes BANG!

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Qadeer_Khan#Pakistan_army_accused_of_proliferation

On July 4, 2008 he in an interview blamed President Musharraf and Pakistan Army for the transfer of nuclear technology, he claimed that Musharraf was aware of all the deals and he was the "Big Boss" for those deals[36].

Khan said that Pakistan gave centrifuges to North Korea in a 2000 shipment supervised by the army. The uranium enrichment equipment was sent from Pakistan in a North Korean plane loaded under the supervision of Pakistani security officials. He also said that he had travelled to North Korea in 1999 with a Pakistani Army general to buy shoulder-launched missiles from the government there. Asked why he had taken sole responsibility for the nuclear proliferation, Khan said friends, including a central figure in the ruling party at the time, had persuaded him that it was in the national interest. In return he had been promised complete freedom.[7]

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Scriabin
Is Hu still on 1st?
no eye deer, but apparently, how long, is a piece of string!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
no eye deer, but apparently, how long, is a piece of string!
So, what's on 2nd?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Except Germany, which is masculine: Fatherland. Or at least it was,
Beat me to the punch!

Are big monster trucks female too?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
Oh. Everyone.
Well, except the catholics. They're obviously innocent.
Those Catholics do like their innocence...

😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
The chance of North Korea waging an offensive war, either conventional or nuclear, is extremely remote. And as long as the US maintains its own nuclear arsenal, it has no real moral justification for demanding that other countries refrain from doing the same. The great concern with the proliferation of third world nuclear arsenals is not that those countrie ...[text shortened]... would be ineffective. The deterrent of "mutually assured destruction" would not be applicable.
Great post!

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Great post!
No. Not a great post, very short sighted thinking. The threat is that N. korea would launch a missile at Seoul and then swarm across the border.
Or sell/give their weapons to the wrong people.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Scriabin
So, what's on 2nd?
surely, you mean, who's on 2nd?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
No. Not a great post, very short sighted thinking. The threat is that N. korea would launch a missile at Seoul and then swarm across the border.
Or sell/give their weapons to the wrong people.
Do you think the West/international community is ready to deputize a quazi communist country, in the form of China, to police any possible threat? It would serve to acknowledge China's emergence as an economic superpower and signal a paradigm shift in terms of the makeup of global strategic security.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
surely, you mean, who's on 2nd?
No, I don't mean who's on 2nd. Who's on 1st ...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
Do you think the West/international community is ready to deputize a quazi communist country, in the form of China, to police any possible threat? It would serve to acknowledge China's emergence as an economic superpower and signal a paradigm shift in terms of the makeup of global strategic security.
N Korea already has sold their missile tech and nuclear tech to Iran -- the Syrian reactor taken out by Israel in 2007 was N Korean built using Iranian funds

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Scriabin
N Korea already has sold their missile tech and nuclear tech to Iran -- the Syrian reactor taken out by Israel in 2007 was N Korean built using Iranian funds
It was? Is that hot off the press from the Mossad?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
It was? Is that hot off the press from the Mossad?
No it's just a fact.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
No it's just a fact.
Like all those weapons of mass destruction Saddam had right before the invasion was a "fact"?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Scriabin
No, I don't mean who's on 2nd. Who's on 1st ...
Well if you know who's on 1st then, what's the man's name?